4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 updateUniv Colorado, CO USA.
Linköping University, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Diagnostics and Specialist Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Univ Calif San Francisco, CA USA.
Univ Michigan, MI USA.
Fdn CNR Tuscany Reg G Monasterio, Italy.
Mayo Clin Rochester, MN USA.
Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Germany; Univ Lubeck, Germany.
Univ East Anglia, England.
Univ Childrens Hosp, Switzerland; Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Switzerland.
Kangwon Natl Univ, South Korea.
Charite, Germany; German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Germany; Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany.
Univ Calif San Francisco, CA USA.
Univ Calif San Diego, CA USA.
Univ Wisconsin, WI USA.
Univ & ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Northwestern Univ, IL USA.
Northwestern Univ, IL USA.
Hosp Santa Cruz, Portugal.
Northwestern Med, IL USA.
Mayo Clin Rochester, MN USA; Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Germany; Univ Wisconsin, WI USA.
Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands; Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Netherlands.
Northwestern Univ, IL USA; Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, IL USA.
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Spain; CIBER CV, Spain.
Leiden Univ, Netherlands; Ctr Congenital Heart Defects Amsterdam Leiden, Netherlands.
Univ Wisconsin, WI USA.
Northwestern Univ, IL USA; Univ Greifswald, Germany.
Univ Valparaiso, Chile; Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Chile; Millennium Inst Intelligent Healthcare Engn iHEAL, Chile.
CHU Vaudois, Switzerland.
Stanford Univ, CA USA.
Lund Univ, Sweden.
Leiden Univ, Netherlands.
Leiden Univ, Netherlands.
Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore.
Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Peoples R China.
Univ Wisconsin, WI USA.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, ISSN 1097-6647, E-ISSN 1532-429X, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 40Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2023. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 40
Keywords [en]
4D Flow CMR; 4D Flow MRI; Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging; MR flow imaging; Hemodynamics; Flow visualization; Flow quantification; Recommendations; Clinical; Cardiovascular; Heart disease
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-197554DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00942-zISI: 001030669300002PubMedID: 37474977OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-197554DiVA, id: diva2:1795750
2023-09-112023-09-112024-05-02