liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cohort analysis of child abuse and neglect cases treated during the initial 2 years of a programme to support hospital-based child protection work in Austria
Med Univ Vienna, Austria.
Med Univ Vienna, Austria.
Med Univ Vienna, Austria.
Med Univ Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 13, no 7Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

ObjectiveTo describe characteristics of suspected child abuse and neglect (CAN) cases associated with the decision of paediatric departments (PDs) in Vienna, Austria, to involve services of a regional tertiary child protection service programme (Forensische Kinder- und JugendUntersuchungsStelle, FOKUS). DesignRetrospective cohort analysis of a regional data collection of CAN cases over the first 2 years of FOKUSs operational period (1 July 2015-30 June 2017). SettingAll CAN cases reported to the PDs of six public hospitals in Vienna. Five of these public hospitals were secondary heath care centres and one was a tertiary healthcare centre. ResultsOverall, 231 cases (59.1%) were treated without and 160 (40.9%) with additional involvement of the FOKUS service programme. The odds of a case to be treated without FOKUS involvement were higher if neglect was suspected (OR 3.233, 95% CI 2.024 to 5.279). In contrast, when sexual abuse was suspected, the odds for involvement with FOKUS were significantly higher (OR 7.577, 95% CI 4.580 to 12.879). The odds of being managed with FOKUS services nearly doubled when multiple forms of abuse were suspected (OR 1.926, 95% CI 1.136 to 3.285). The odds for additional FOKUS involvement were significantly lower for patients treated as inpatients (OR 0.239, 95% CI 0.151 to 0.373). CAN patients managed with FOKUS involvement were significantly more often reported to law enforcement (LE) (OR 3.234, 95% CI 2.078 to 5.002). Concurrently, suspected sexual abuse cases and cases reported to LE were more frequently treated in the PD of the tertiary centre than in other PDs (& chi;(2) p<0.001). ConclusionCAN case characteristics significantly influenced if PDs involved a tertiary child protection programme. Suspected sexual abuse, if more than one form of CAN was suspected and cases reported to LE required additional specialist expertise. For suspected neglect involvement of tertiary services seemed less important.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2023. Vol. 13, no 7
Keywords [en]
child protection; non-accidental injury; community child health; paediatric A & E and ambulatory care
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-197588DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071536ISI: 001042144500071PubMedID: 37451739OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-197588DiVA, id: diva2:1796030
Note

Funding Agencies|Austrian Federal Ministry for Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection [40030/0002]; Vienna Health Council; Medical University Vienna; Medical- Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Vienna, City of Vienna [15131 2016]

Available from: 2023-09-11 Created: 2023-09-11 Last updated: 2023-09-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Otterman, Gabriel
By organisation
BarnafridFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf