A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failureShow others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 67, no 10, p. 1383-1394Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BackgroundWhen caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.MethodsWe distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.ResultsThe survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.ConclusionsThe responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2023. Vol. 67, no 10, p. 1383-1394
Keywords [en]
acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure; acute respiratory distress syndrome; controlled ventilation; invasive mechanical ventilation; spontaneous ventilation; survey
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-198367DOI: 10.1111/aas.14317ISI: 001069053200001PubMedID: 37737652OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-198367DiVA, id: diva2:1803585
Note
Funding Agencies|This study was supported by the Department of Research and Development, Division of Critical Care and Emergencies, Oslo University Hospital and by South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, project number 2021061. Funders had no role in the design or; Department of Research and Development, Division of Critical Care and Emergencies, Oslo University Hospital [2021061]; South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
2023-10-092023-10-092024-04-09Bibliographically approved