liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
Oslo Univ Hosp, Norway; Univ Oslo, Norway.
Aalborg Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Karolinska Univ, Sweden.
Alesund Hosp, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 67, no 10, p. 1383-1394Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundWhen caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.MethodsWe distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.ResultsThe survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.ConclusionsThe responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2023. Vol. 67, no 10, p. 1383-1394
Keywords [en]
acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure; acute respiratory distress syndrome; controlled ventilation; invasive mechanical ventilation; spontaneous ventilation; survey
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-198367DOI: 10.1111/aas.14317ISI: 001069053200001PubMedID: 37737652OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-198367DiVA, id: diva2:1803585
Note

Funding Agencies|This study was supported by the Department of Research and Development, Division of Critical Care and Emergencies, Oslo University Hospital and by South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, project number 2021061. Funders had no role in the design or; Department of Research and Development, Division of Critical Care and Emergencies, Oslo University Hospital [2021061]; South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

Available from: 2023-10-09 Created: 2023-10-09 Last updated: 2024-04-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Chew, Michelle S

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chew, Michelle S
By organisation
Division of Clinical Chemistry and PharmacologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesANOPIVA US
In the same journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf