liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The LEAP checklist for Laboratory Evaluation and Analytical Performance Characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures
Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Singapore.
Fiona Stanley Hosp, Australia.
Hanoi Med Univ, Vietnam; Natl Childrens Hosp, Vietnam.
Flinders Univ S Australia, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, ISSN 0036-5513, E-ISSN 1502-7686, Vol. 83, no 7, p. 467-469Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript.The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the LEAP checklist will improve the standardisation of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2023. Vol. 83, no 7, p. 467-469
Keywords [en]
Emerging technology (ies); method verification; method validation
National Category
Biomedical Laboratory Science/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-198847DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2023.2261098ISI: 001082034600001PubMedID: 37838359OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-198847DiVA, id: diva2:1808793
Note

Funding Agencies|We wish to acknowledge the helpful comments provided by the corresponding members of the IFCC WG-MEP that have been incorporated into the published version of the checklist.

Available from: 2023-11-01 Created: 2023-11-01 Last updated: 2024-04-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Theodorsson, Elvar
By organisation
Division of Clinical Chemistry and PharmacologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Clinical Chemistry
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Biomedical Laboratory Science/Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf