liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression
IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Italy; Humanitas Univ, Italy.
Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Italy; Humanitas Univ, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Italy; Humanitas Univ, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Critical Care, ISSN 1364-8535, E-ISSN 1466-609X, Vol. 27, no 1, article id 431Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundPulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV) have been widely used in surgical patients as predictors of fluid challenge (FC) response. Several factors may affect the reliability of these indices in predicting fluid responsiveness, such as the position of the patient, the use of laparoscopy and the opening of the abdomen or the chest, combined FC characteristics, the tidal volume (Vt) and the type of anesthesia.MethodsSystematic review and metanalysis of PPV and SVV use in surgical adult patients. The QUADAS-2 scale was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. We adopted a metanalysis pooling of aggregate data from 5 subgroups of studies with random effects models using the common-effect inverse variance model. The area under the curve (AUC) of pooled receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves was reported. A metaregression was performed using FC type, volume, and rate as independent variables.ResultsWe selected 59 studies enrolling 2,947 patients, with a median of fluid responders of 55% (46-63). The pooled AUC for the PPV was 0.77 (0.73-0.80), with a mean threshold of 10.8 (10.6-11.0). The pooled AUC for the SVV was 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with a mean threshold of 12.1 (11.6-12.7); 19 studies (32.2%) reported the grey zone of PPV or SVV, with a median of 56% (40-62) and 57% (46-83) of patients included, respectively. In the different subgroups, the AUC and the best thresholds ranged from 0.69 and 0.81 and from 6.9 to 11.5% for the PPV, and from 0.73 to 0.79 and 9.9 to 10.8% for the SVV. A high Vt and the choice of colloids positively impacted on PPV performance, especially among patients with closed chest and abdomen, or in prone position.ConclusionThe overall performance of PPV and SVV in operating room in predicting fluid responsiveness is moderate, ranging close to an AUC of 0.80 only some subgroups of surgical patients. The grey zone of these dynamic indices is wide and should be carefully considered during the assessment of fluid responsiveness. A high Vt and the choice of colloids for the FC are factors potentially influencing PPV reliability.Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022379120), December 2022. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=379120ConclusionThe overall performance of PPV and SVV in operating room in predicting fluid responsiveness is moderate, ranging close to an AUC of 0.80 only some subgroups of surgical patients. The grey zone of these dynamic indices is wide and should be carefully considered during the assessment of fluid responsiveness. A high Vt and the choice of colloids for the FC are factors potentially influencing PPV reliability.Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022379120), December 2022. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=379120

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2023. Vol. 27, no 1, article id 431
Keywords [en]
Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation; Fluid responsiveness; Fluid therapy; Hemodynamic monitoring
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-199438DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04706-0ISI: 001097433300002PubMedID: 37940953OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-199438DiVA, id: diva2:1816893
Note

Funding Agencies|Not applicable.

Available from: 2023-12-04 Created: 2023-12-04 Last updated: 2024-09-12

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1327 kB)3 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1327 kBChecksum SHA-512
4d0fc3fb4c71fc0c8d13bc4fe659df2ecf7ba9fed7ab8f860d25839cb0f7d63b8d7acead0daf23dcd1b31cf0bfe8ba9a6897ca4737cd9bc30e9dcc15db13a568
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chew, Michelle
By organisation
Division of Clinical Chemistry and PharmacologyFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesANOPIVA US
In the same journal
Critical Care
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf