liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quantile connectedness and the determinants between FinTech and traditional financial institutions: Evidence from China
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China; Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Peoples R China.
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China.
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China; Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Peoples R China.
Hunan Univ, Peoples R China; Hunan Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Ind Dig, Peoples R China.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Global Finance Journal, ISSN 1044-0283, E-ISSN 1873-5665, Vol. 58, article id 100906Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study examines the connectedness and risk spillovers between Chinese FinTech and traditional financial institutions by using quantile-based vector autoregression (QVAR) networks. Specifically, by using daily data from January 2014 to June 2022, we focus on system-, sector-, and institution-level quantile connectedness characteristics, with the following findings. At the system level, the QVAR networks linking FinTech and traditional financial institutions are more connected at the extreme quantiles than at the median quantile. At the sector level, banks, real estate firms, and FinTech sectors act as net risk receivers, whereas securities and insurers act as net risk emitters. At the institutional level, risk transmission and reception of institutions significantly increase when market conditions rapidly change. We also investigate the determinants of quantile connectedness by using an exponential random graph model and find that (i) across different quantiles, the book-to-market and return on equity of institutions have a positive impact on their risk spillovers; (ii) at the extreme quantiles, the book-to-market is more pronounced than the return on equity; and (iii) at the median quantile, banks and FinTech institutions are more connected than insurers, real estate firms, securities, and other financials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER , 2023. Vol. 58, article id 100906
Keywords [en]
FinTech; Financial institutions; Quantile connectedness; Determinants; Risk spillovers; Exponential random graph model
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-200063DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100906ISI: 001114408200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-200063DiVA, id: diva2:1827567
Note

Funding Agencies|National Natural Science Foundation of China [72271087, 71871088, 71971079]; National Social Science Foundation of China [21ZDA114]; Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [21JJ20019]; Huxiang Youth Talent Support Program

Available from: 2024-01-15 Created: 2024-01-15 Last updated: 2024-01-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Uddin, Gazi Salah
By organisation
EconomicsFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Global Finance Journal
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf