liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Concept of Human Development: A Comparative Study of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics.
2008 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Magister), 20 points / 30 hpStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This thesis is an examination of the concept of human development and does a comparative study of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Sen rectifies the emphasis on income by welfare economics, and argues for the ‘equality of capability’; a goal that he says can be achieved by means of the intrinsic and instrumental role of democracy. However, the author notes that Sen’s development paradigm is inadequate as an account for what constitutes the kind of well-being that is fully human and asserts that Sen’s framework should be concretized politically. In view of this, the author argues that Nussbaum’s articulation of a ‘threshold of capabilities’, anchored on her reading Aristotle’s concept of human flourishing and Marx’s insight on human dignity, is a politically realistic human development framework. Nussbaum thinks that the essential human capabilities are entitlements that must be constitutionally guaranteed to ensure a decent and dignified human life for all. As a response to the reality of pluralism, Nussbaum says that the universality of these entitlements can be secured by means of an overlapping consensus. Furthermore, the extreme poverty in many nations which exposes women and children to much vulnerability has provoked the author to inquire about the applicability of Nussbaum’s framework to the global arena. As such, the thesis argues for the radical expansion of the Human Development Index used by the United Nations Development Program in measuring the quality of human life, notably the inclusion of political liberties and gender equality. In addition to this, the study puts forward the argument that global human development is best achieved through democracy, and asserts that global institutions have a moral duty to protect and promote the central human capabilities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Centrum för tillämpad etik , 2008. , 83 p.
Keyword [en]
Capability Approach, Amartya Sen, Martha Nussbaum, Human Development, HDI
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-11974ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--08/03--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-11974DiVA: diva2:18358
Presentation
2008-05-29, 3260, KEY, Campus Valla, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 14:00
Uppsok
humaniora/teologi
Supervisors
Available from: 2008-06-03 Created: 2008-06-03

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(520 kB)13352 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 520 kBChecksum MD5
9b170fdab3ca32fa0c61cc7e5d437667a56c677170f891745d8a9d17f8b44f25bee33095
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Centre for Applied Ethics
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 13352 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 2232 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf