liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of true non-contrast and virtual noncontrast images in the characterization of renal lesions using detector-based spectral CT
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands; Department of Medical Physics, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
Department of Medical Physics, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: British Journal of Radiology, ISSN 0007-1285, E-ISSN 1748-880X, Vol. 96, no 1149, article id 20220157Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Renal lesions are sometimes incidentally detected during computed tomography (CT) examinations in which an unenhanced series is not included, preventing the lesions from being fully characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility to use virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, acquired using a detector-based dual-energy CT, for the characterization of renal lesions. Methods: Twenty-seven patients (12 women) underwent a renal CT scan, including a non-contrast, an arterial, and a venous phase contrast-enhanced series, using a detector-based dual-energy CT scanner. VNC images were reconstructed from the venous contrast-enhanced series. The mean attenuation values of 65 renal lesions in both the VNC and true non-contrast (TNC) images were measured and compared quantitatively. Three radiologists blindly assessed all lesions using either VNC or TNC images in combination with contrast-enhanced images. Results: Sixteen patients had cystic lesions, five had angiomyolipoma (AML), and six had suspected renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Attenuation values in VNC and TNC images were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.7, mean difference −6.0 ± 13 HU). The largest differences were found for unenhanced high-attenuation lesions. Radiologists classified 86% of the lesions correctly using VNC images. Conclusions: In 70% of the patients, incidentally detected renal lesions could be accurately characterized using VNC images, resulting in less patient burden and a reduction in radiation exposure. Advances in knowledge: This study shows that renal lesions can be accurately characterized using VNC images acquired by detector-based dual-energy CT, which is in agreement with previous studies using dual-source and rapid X-ray tube potential switching technique. © 2023 The Authors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
British Institute of Radiology , 2023. Vol. 96, no 1149, article id 20220157
Keywords [en]
Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Contrast Media; Female; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Veins; contrast medium; adult; angiomyolipoma; Article; cancer patient; clinical article; computer assisted tomography; contrast enhancement; controlled study; data analysis; dual energy computed tomography; feasibility study; female; human; image analysis; information processing; iterative reconstruction; kidney injury; quantitative analysis; radiation exposure; renal cell carcinoma; sensitivity and specificity; x-ray computed tomography; diagnostic imaging; kidney; kidney tumor; procedures; radiography; renal cell carcinoma; retrospective study; vein
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-200774DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220157ISI: 001171489400007PubMedID: 37334964Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85168316035OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-200774DiVA, id: diva2:1835874
Available from: 2024-02-07 Created: 2024-02-07 Last updated: 2024-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1417 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1417 kBChecksum SHA-512
43589ccff16d1b03054c3f8719100aeee31c85ff21223a5bb3f3771460bce9bcc00cddc4c28f1217f7850f37988d15ff288586cb936bb8aea03b97e628e40ff2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Tesselaar, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tesselaar, Erik
By organisation
Division of Diagnostics and Specialist MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesMedical radiation physics
In the same journal
British Journal of Radiology
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf