liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The Golden Rule and Bioethics. A Reflection upon the Foundation of Ethics
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics.
2002 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

The object of this thesis is the foundation of ethics. The question is whether there exists a universal core to ethics consisting of a fundamental ethical principle across cultures. This principle could for example be the so-called Golden Rule, which goes as follows: ‘You should do to others what you want them to do to you’. The Golden Rule is to be found in many of the world’s religions and is also reflected in secular society. The rule can for example be found in a political version in legal declarations e.g. the Humans Rights Declaration of 1948. There are philosophersand scientists who interpret the Golden Rule secularly. If one looks at the Golden Rule from a non-religious point of view, it can be understood for instance in the following ways: 1) As a rule which is followed to fulfil self-interest and 2) As a rule concerning role reversal. In this thesis we will go into detail on these two interpretations of the Golden Rule, because as we will see, they can be seen as two very different views of human nature. We will discuss which of the two interpretations of the Golden Rule is most adequate in connection with the description of human beings as moral agents having reason, motives, freedom and responsibility. Furthermore we will focus on the Golden Rule in a Nordic context, in this connection we will look at whether the Golden Rule corresponds to the four bioethical principles presented by the two American philosophers Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress. These principles are the principle of respect for autonomy, the principle of nonmaleficence, the principle of beneficence and the principle of justice. According to the Danish physician Henrik R. Wulff one cannot use Beauchamp and Childress’ bioethical principles as a tool for solving ethical problems in the North, because they do not correspond to the Golden Rule. Wulff argues that the Golden Rule is a moral ideal within the health services in the Nordic countries. The purpose of the thesis is, among others, to analyse and discuss whether the four bioethical principles are implicitly contained within the Golden Rule and whether Beauchamp and Childress’ method can be used to analyse bioethical problems in a Nordic context. Finally, we will set forth an ethical assessment of a treatment within biomedicine. As an example of the application of the four bioethical principles, we will look at whether human somatic gene therapy is an ethical acceptable treatment. Thus my thesis is that the Golden Rule can be viewed as a fundamental ethical principle across cultures and that Beauchamp and Childress’ four bioethical principles correspond to the Golden Rule. That is, I think there is a reason to maintain, that the bioethical principles can be of use for solving bioethical problems across cultures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Centrum för tillämpad etik , 2002.
Keyword [en]
Ethics, The Golden Rule, Beauchamp&Childress'Four Bioethical Principles, Ethical Assessment of Somatic Gene Therapy
Keyword [sv]
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-1474ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--02/01--SEOAI: diva2:18798
Available from: 2003-01-08 Created: 2003-01-08

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1002 kB)2029 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1002 kBChecksum SHA-1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Centre for Applied Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2029 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1228 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link