liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Who should decide, and about what?: Reflections on reprogenetic choices and the scope of parental autonomy
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics.
2004 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year))Student thesisAlternative title
Vem skall bestämma, och om vad? : Reflektioner kring reprogenetiska val och omfattningen av föräldrars autonomi (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

In this thesis the scope and limits of reprogenetic choices - refering to reproductive applications of genetics made in the medical context - is adressed.

Through posing four analytical questions concerning who should cecide about what in reprogenetics an analysis of possible answers is made. The method consists of an analysis of texts of ethicists Robertson, Strong, Davis, Murray, Peters and Buchanan et al, chosen to reflect a diversity concerning the scope of reproductive autonomy and what values that need to be taken into consideration.

The most justified position found, concerning a possible policy of reprogenetic choices, is that there are several good reasons for leaving the reprogenetic choices with the parents, foremost since reproduction indeed is central to individuals identity, dignity and meaning of life. There are also good reasons to avoid governmental steering. This for instance since steering risks promoting perfectibilism, which would threaten human dignity. But also the reprogenetic choices cannot be left unrestricted. It is then argued that restrictions of parental reproductive autonomy should serve to protect the childs right to an open future, and that choices that reflect a search for perfectibilism should be cautioned. Autonomous reprogenetic choices should mean qualified choices - where relevant information is given and also an opportunity to make more than one choice is fostered.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004.
Keyword [en]
Ethics, Reprogenetics, autonomy, parental choice, prenatal testing, PGD, gene therapy, selective abortion, eugenics, public policy
Keyword [sv]
Etik
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-1643ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--04/05--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-1643DiVA: diva2:18967
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
humaniora/teologi
Available from: 2004-07-01 Created: 2004-07-01

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(343 kB)899 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 343 kBChecksum MD5
d6a7a242ffb2fe6ca7e9b1553bc7056fc9754a2d9da6353425780d6d4edae4c8dc10f74e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Centre for Applied Ethics
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 899 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 692 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf