liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of Inventions: ReducingTime in a DEAR Process
Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics.
2003 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Magister)Student thesis
Abstract [en]

Legislative changes in the U.S. and more recently Germany, require universities and research institutes to act as entrepreneurs, something that is not necessarily in their nature. Therefore, a number of Technology Transfer Organizations or Evaluation Agencies have been established to handle the evaluation, patenting and commercialization of inventions. The process of evaluating inventions, in this thesis termed DEAR, poses two major challenges for evaluation agencies: (1) the process must be aimed at keeping the inventions that will generate revenues and filtering out those that will not; and (2) the time spent on evaluation should be kept to a minimum, but must never be reduced below the point where potential commercial successes will be lost. The purpose of this thesis is to benchmark the practices of evaluation agencies in order to establish whether time can be reduced in any part of the DEAR process and if so where. We find that there are aspects in almost every stage of the DEAR process that could be made more effective. For instance, it may be worthwhile for the German agencies to reflect on the fact that their U.S. counterparts generally seem to rely on the scientific information given in the disclosure. Also, even though valuation of inventions often becomes a case of"Garbage In - Garbage Out", such valuation may be worthwhile for younger agencies since it may signal that the DEAR process is conducted in a thorough and accurate manner.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ekonomiska institutionen , 2003. , 144 p.
Series
Master Thesis in Business Administration (Magisteruppsats från Ekonomprogrammet), 2003:19
Keyword [en]
Business and economics, Technology Transfer, Evaluation of Inventions, Benchmarking, Go/No Decision, Öystein Fredriksen, Commercialization of University Research
Keyword [sv]
Ekonomi
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-1802OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-1802DiVA: diva2:19128
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Available from: 2003-06-16 Created: 2003-06-16

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1395 kB)538 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1395 kBChecksum SHA-1
0f0062f3cad6e11a2df8ac50270fe584846cd9b3b6cc593b22534ebb759d37221fb22176
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Management and Economics
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 538 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 386 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf