liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explaining Protective Trade Policies: Political Economy, Trade and Media Effects
Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics.
2003 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Magister)Student thesisAlternative title
Protektionistisk handelspolitik: Politisk ekonomi, internationell handel och mediaeffekter (Swedish)
Abstract [en]

This paper draws on communications research to complement existing models of the political economy of trade policy by introducing the role of media as an institution interacting with policy makers, special interest groups and the public, influencing the formulation of policy and supporting a bias towards protective trade policies. Through the concepts of framing and perceived public opinion, media can contribute to and reinforce problem definitions and suggested solutions that limit the range of alternative policies available to policy makers. In the case of trade policy, established frames for conflict discourse that are efficiently represented in media give incentives to special interest groups to voice demands for support that focus on foreign adversaries, trade interventions and import restrictions. The hypothesis that media effects can contribute to trade policies based on tariffs or other forms of import restrictions is tested by an empirical examination of media coverage leading up to the U.S. decision to impose tariffs on imported steel in the spring 2002. The empirical study of news coverage in the New York Times suggests that to the extent that policy makers are concerned about real or perceived public opinion, they have incentives to adopt tariff-based or other import-restricting trade policies, rather than economically more efficient redistributive policies, wherever the conflict frame is prevalent and special interest groups have media access.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ekonomiska institutionen , 2003. , 24 p.
Series
Master Thesis in Economics, 2003:08
Keyword [en]
Economics, International trade, political economy, trade policy, institutional economics, special interest groups, media, framing, public opinion. Internationell handel, politisk ekonomi, handelspolitik, institutionell ekonomi, särintressen, media, framing, opinion.
Keyword [sv]
Nationalekonomi
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-2012DiVA: diva2:19340
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Available from: 2003-11-07 Created: 2003-11-07

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(224 kB)543 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 224 kBChecksum MD5
835082d06f827e23f6185df40e6bc302733ea6054e54653e2ee1b0783907f37e0475d529
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Management and Economics
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 543 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 878 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf