liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Något om misstag inom avtalsrätten: särskilt om gränsdragningen mellan förklaringsmisstag och motivvillfarelse
Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics.
2004 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Magister)Student thesisAlternative title
The Concept of Mistake in Swedish Contract Law : Particularly Regarding the Borderline Between Errors Concerning the Content of the Agreement and Errors in Motive (English)
Abstract [en]

According to Swedish contract law, a mistake in contract can be categorized as either an error concerning the content of the agreement or an error in motive. An error concerning the content of the agreement could be described as a divergence between a party’s intent and his declaration, while an error in motive is a mistake about the reasons why a party would like to agree to the contract. The borderline between these two types of mistakes is based on Savigny’s theories on echt (error in motive) and unecht (error in content) mistakes.

The law thus states a clear and specific borderline separating these two types of errors from each other. However, this borderline has not been upheld by the courts. Instead the courts, on numerous occasions (e.g. AD 98/1980, NJA 1939 s. 384 och NJA 1991 s. 509), have failed to correctly determine whether a mistake should be considered an error concerning the content or an error in motive. Most of the judgements are very unclear and have caused confusion among scholars and lawyers.

In this thesis, the leading cases with regard to the borderline are thoroughly analyzed. Further, three different ways of clarifying the borderline are identified, as well as examined. The thesis also discusses different theories on mistake in contract, particularly the relationship between 32 § avtalslagen and the doctrine of assumptions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ekonomiska institutionen , 2004.
Series
Master Thesis in Business Administration (Magisteruppsats från Ekonomprogrammet), 2004:20
Keyword [en]
Law, misstag, förklaringsmisstag, motivvillfarelse, förutsättningsläran, 32 § avtalslagen, Savigny
Keyword [sv]
RÄTTSVETENSKAP/JURIDIK
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2080OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-2080DiVA: diva2:19409
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Available from: 2005-02-25 Created: 2005-02-25

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1032 kB)4353 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1032 kBChecksum MD5
cde44622f74356f5c012776cb9b3339601af499dcc678ede85ed857f893c09848944f6b1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Management and Economics
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4353 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf