liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Intimate Connection Between Autonomy and Decision-Making in Applied Health Care Ethics
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics.
2004 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

The intimate connection between autonomy and decision-making in applied health care, especially in various kinds of consent and refusal has taken center stage in medical ethics since the Salgo decision in 1957. Prior to that time, the physician’s supposedly moral duty to provide appropriate medical care typically surpassed the legal obligation to respect patient’s autonomy. The Salgo decision concluded that physicians have a legal duty to provide facts necessary for the patient to make an informed decision. "The doctor knows best" long ago was replaced with "The doctor proposes; the patient disposes." There is no legal obligation for the patient’s choice to be palatable to anyone, other than that patient himself/herself. Although Beauchamp and Childress justified the obligation to solicit decisions from patients and potential research subjects by the principle of respect for autonomy, they however, acknowledged that the principle’s precise demands remain unsettled and open to interpretations and specification. This thesis addresses a current debate in the bioethical community on the four-principle approach. Using Tom Beauchamp and James Childress as case study, to discuss mainly the principle of respect for autonomy, I go on to explain their central arguments concerning this principle in relation to decision making in health care ethics. Rather than focus on their respective weaknesses, which many theorist and health care professionals do, I emphasis instead on the contribution the principle of respect for autonomy can make in the process of ethical decision making in health care situation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004.
Keyword [en]
Ethics, Autonomy, Decision-Making, Beauchamp and Childress, Case Study, Health Care Ethics.
Keyword [sv]
Etik
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2402ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--04/01--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-2402DiVA: diva2:19734
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
humaniora/teologi
Available from: 2004-06-10 Created: 2004-06-10 Last updated: 2009-02-10

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(496 kB)1093 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 496 kBChecksum MD5
d378cef73c894d0450022f7d9dfcd59ba1a12ad6d7dfd66c6249371d9322921a8b020868
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Centre for Applied Ethics
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1093 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 703 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf