liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating driver distraction countermeasures
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science.
2004 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Magister)Student thesis
Abstract [en]

Statistics showing that in-vehicle driver distraction is a major contributing cause in road accidents is presented. Driver distraction is defined building on the driving theory by Gibson and Crooks. The idea to use driver distraction countermeasures as a way of mitigating the effects of the driver distraction problem is then introduced. A requirement list is formulated with ten requirements that distraction countermeasures should meet. A simplification of regarding distraction as a gaze direction problem makes way for designing an experiment to evaluate two driver distraction countermeasures in which new eye- tracking technology plays a key role. The experiment also makes use of a simulator, a surrogate in-vehicle information system as a distractor, and thirty subjects. The most important dependent measures were in-vehicle glance time and a steering wheel reaction time measure. The evaluated countermeasures – a blue flash at middle of the road position and a kinesthetic brake pulse – could, however, not be shown to meet the most important of the requirements formulated. The lack of effect of the countermeasures in the experiment may either depend on their actual inefficiency or on methodological shortcomings of the experiment. These alternatives are discussed. It is speculated that the biggest problems with the possible lack of actual efficiency have to do with that the theoretical basis for using a flash did not transfer to the driving setting, and that the brake pulse used was too weak. The methodological problems have to do with the non-validated dependent measures used, missing data, nuisance warnings, insufficient distractors, non-precise hypotheses, and difficulties with separating the effect of the countermeasures from the psychological force to look on the road.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutionen för datavetenskap , 2004.
Keyword [en]
Interdisciplinary studies, Driving Behavior, Accident Prevention, Attention, Distraction, Simulators, Eye Movements
Keyword [sv]
TVÄRVETENSKAP
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2456ISRN: LIU-KOGVET-D--04/08--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-2456DiVA: diva2:19788
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Available from: 2005-01-28 Created: 2005-01-28

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(932 kB)1369 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 932 kBChecksum MD5
4388195b1e1fe8680c1b1bb27e5c6bb84d797602b236fdea091fe8224601d67f70ad54f2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Computer and Information Science
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1369 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 816 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf