liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Den moderata rationalismen: Kommentarer, preciseringar och kritik av några begrepp och teser som framlagts av Laurence Bonjour i dennes In Defense of Pure Reason
Linköping University, Department of Religion and Culture.
2005 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 points / 15 hpStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The paper contains comment, clarification and criticism, even constructive criticism, of some theses that have been put forward by Laurence Bonjour in his In Defense of Pure Reason.

It presents a concept of experience that deals with the relation between cognizer and object of experience that has a great similarity to that of Bonjour. Through analysis it is shown that the concept of a priori entails that Bonjour has two concepts of a priori, a narrow and a broad one. The narrow one is, in my own words: According to moderate rationalism a proposition p is a priori justified if and only if you apprehend that p must be true in every possible world. This doesn’t mean that Bonjour doesn’t believe in an epistemological, metaphysical and semantic realm. The broad one does not mention anything about possible worlds.

Casullo in his A priori justification rejects Bonjour’s argument against Quine’s coherentism. A defense is put forward with the concept ‘an ideal of science for apparent rational insights’. The concept of axiomatic system and foundationalism is used. If we assume that the colour proposition ‘nothing can be red all over and green all over at the same time’ has the meaning that we, in this very moment, are representing a property in the world, thus we have an argument of superposition for the correctness of the proposition. The ground for this argumentation relies on the identification of colours with superposing electromagnetic waves.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutionen för religion och kultur , 2005. , 29 p.
Keyword [en]
A priori, a posteriori, superpose, red, blue, magenta, Bonjour, Kripke, Peano, justification, necessary, possible, analytic, synthetic, empiricism, rationalism, color
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-4543ISRN: LI-IRK/TFIL-C--05/002--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-4543DiVA: diva2:20639
Uppsok
humaniora/teologi
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-10-31 Created: 2005-10-31

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(287 kB)1032 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 287 kBChecksum SHA-1
eecfe9aca9956c112dd7a6485e69007c10a12675247144f3b538a80fa95ea1bffcdf6334
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Religion and Culture
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1032 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 471 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf