liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk of injury in elite football played on artificial turf versus natural grass: a prospective two-cohort study.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Social Medicine and Public Health Science.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Social Medicine and Public Health Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6049-5402
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6883-1471
2006 (English)In: British journal of sports medicine, ISSN 1473-0480, Vol. 40, no 12, 975-80 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To compare injury risk in elite football played on artificial turf compared with natural grass.

DESIGN: Prospective two-cohort study.

SETTING: Male European elite football leagues.

PARTICIPANTS: 290 players from 10 elite European clubs that had installed third-generation artificial turf surfaces in 2003-4, and 202 players from the Swedish Premier League acting as a control group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Injury incidence.

RESULTS: The incidence of injury during training and match play did not differ between surfaces for the teams in the artificial turf cohort: 2.42 v 2.94 injuries/1000 training hours and 19.60 v 21.48 injuries/1000 match hours for artificial turf and grass respectively. The risk of ankle sprain was increased in matches on artificial turf compared with grass (4.83 v 2.66 injuries/1000 match hours; rate ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 3.28). No difference in injury severity was seen between surfaces. Compared with the control cohort who played home games on natural grass, teams in the artificial turf cohort had a lower injury incidence during match play (15.26 v 23.08 injuries/1000 match hours; rate ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of a greater risk of injury was found when football was played on artificial turf compared with natural grass. The higher incidence of ankle sprain on artificial turf warrants further attention, although this result should be interpreted with caution as the number of ankle sprains was low.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 40, no 12, 975-80 p.
Keyword [en]
Athletic injuries, football, surface properties, soccer, artificial turf
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17226DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.027623PubMedID: 16990444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-17226DiVA: diva2:207584
Note

Original Publication:Jan Ekstrand, Toomas Timpka and Martin Hägglund, Risk of injury in elite football played on artificial turf versus natural grass: a prospective two-cohort study, 2006, British journal of sports medicine, (40), 12, 975-80.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.027623Copyright: BMJ Publishing Grouphttp://group.bmj.com/

Available from: 2009-03-11 Created: 2009-03-11 Last updated: 2013-09-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(550 kB)1619 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 550 kBChecksum SHA-512
795ac4ae2e974c1665b4cef10935b6ce621eb773c781cce19628df93f45c76f4cfa709fd5fa625d4c2b4ed490f7387f5af874e045a68e303d9885dac27a4d631
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Ekstrand, JanTimpka, ToomasHägglund, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekstrand, JanTimpka, ToomasHägglund, Martin
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesSocial Medicine and Public Health ScienceDivision of Physiotherapy
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1619 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 341 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf