liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Construct validity of the Assessment of Work Performance (AWP)
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Division of Health, Activity and Care. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rehabilitation Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1607-187X
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 32, no 2, 211-218 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The instrument Assessment of Work Performance (AWP 1.1) can be used to assess an individuals skills during work performance-how efficient and appropriate a client performs a work task. The instrument is currently used by over 300 assessors working in a variety of work rehabilitation settings in Sweden, and it has been used with over 10,000 clients. In this study, the construct validity of the AWP 1.1 was tested with 364 assessments of clients with a variety of various work-related problems assessed by six occupational therapists in a Social Insurance Office in Sweden between 2004 and 2005. Principal Component Analysis shows construct validity of the AWP 1.1. Further, the findings indicate that the instrument is sensitive and discriminates between clients, and no gender related patterns were identified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press, 2009. Vol. 32, no 2, 211-218 p.
Keyword [en]
Instrument development, Model of Human Occupation (MOHO), occupational therapy, vocational rehabilitation
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17879DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0807ISI: 000264925800012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-17879DiVA: diva2:212941
Available from: 2009-04-25 Created: 2009-04-24 Last updated: 2013-09-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Development and Evaluation of Validity and Utility of the Instrument Assessment of Work Performance (AWP)
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Development and Evaluation of Validity and Utility of the Instrument Assessment of Work Performance (AWP)
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The last decades have shown a great need for vocational rehabilitation due to high levels of absenteeism due to sickness and disability pension. An essential part of the vocational rehabilitation process is assessment of persons with reduced work functioning. Adequate and reliable methods for assessment of clients with work disabilities are crucial for both the individuals who are assessed and for society as a whole. Sound and precise work assessments are needed to guide clients to suitable interventions using a minimum of rehabilitation resources. However, work function assessments are complex and there is confusion over work assessment concepts. Therefore, further development and evaluation of adequate concepts and theoretical models within the area of work assessment is needed. Furthermore, vocational rehabilitation lacks adequate and reliable assessment instruments, especially instruments used to observe clients.

This dissertation thesis focuses specifically on the following:

- Development of a conceptual framework for assessment of work functioning [Study I]

- Development and evaluation of validity and utility of the observation instrument Assessment of Work Performance (AWP) [Study II-IV]

Study I proposes a conceptual framework for different dimensions of work functioning and highlights important factors for work assessment. The study also creates a framework to define the purpose, delimination, and possible assessment outcomes of the assessment instrument AWP.

Study II develops an observation instrument for assessment of work performance, the Assessment of Work Performance (AWP) and conducts an initial evaluation of face validity and utility for the instrument. The initial evaluation in study II was made within a group of 21 assessors in Sweden, and the result indicated face validity and utility for the AWP, a result that supported further development and evaluation of the instrument.

Study III investigates the content validity and utility of the AWP. A questionnaire was answered by 67 respondents who used the AWP in various vocational rehabilitation settings in Sweden. The result indicated content validity and utility for the AWP.

Study IV investigates the construct validity of the instrument AWP. This study is based on 364 assessments with the AWP (version 1.1). The clients had various work-related problems and went through an insurance medicine investigation at a Social Insurance Office in Sweden between 2004 and 2005. The major findings in this study indicated that the AWP has construct validity, sensitivity, and the ability to discriminate between clients. It is also gender neutral.

The future evaluation of AWP will comprise testing of predictive validity, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency reliability as well as an evaluation of how and with what results the instrument can be combined with other work-related assessment instruments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutionen för samhälls- och välfärdsstudier, 2007. 20 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1009
Keyword
ability, measurement, MOHO, occupational therapy, rehabilitation, vocational
National Category
Occupational Therapy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-10577 (URN)978-91-85831-04-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2007-09-25, K1, Kåkenhus, Campus Norrköping, LiU, Norrköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2008-01-21 Created: 2008-01-21 Last updated: 2009-08-22

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Ph.D. Thesis

Authority records BETA

Sandqvist, JanBjörk, MathildaGullberg, MatsHenriksson, ChrisGerdle, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandqvist, JanBjörk, MathildaGullberg, MatsHenriksson, ChrisGerdle, Björn
By organisation
Division of Health, Activity and CareFaculty of Health SciencesRehabilitation MedicineNursing ScienceDepartment of Social and Welfare StudiesPain and Rehabilitation Centre
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 424 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf