liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Infrastructural requirements for local implementation of safety policies: the discordance between top-down and bottom-up systems of action
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. (Landstinget i Östergötland; Centre for Public Health Sciences; Centre for Public Health Sciences; Folkhälsovetenskapligt centrum; Folkhälsovetenskapligt centrum)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6049-5402
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2009 (English)In: BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, ISSN 1472-6963 , Vol. 9, no 45Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Safety promotion is planned and practised not only by public health organizations, but also by other welfare state agencies, private companies and non-governmental organizations. The term infrastructure originally denoted the underlying resources needed for warfare, e. g. roads, industries, and an industrial workforce. Today, infrastructure refers to the physical elements, organizations and people needed to run projects in different societal arenas. The aim of this study was to examine associations between infrastructure and local implementation of safety policies in injury prevention and safety promotion programs.

Methods: Qualitative data on municipalities in Sweden designated as Safe Communities were collected from focus group interviews with municipal politicians and administrators, as well as from policy documents, and materials published on the Internet. Actor network theory was used to identify weaknesses in the present infrastructure and determine strategies that can be used to resolve these.

Results: The weakness identification analysis revealed that the factual infrastructure available for effectuating national strategies varied between safety areas and approaches, basically reflecting differences between bureaucratic and network-based organizational models. At the local level, a contradiction between safety promotion and the existence of quasi-markets for local public service providers was found to predispose for a poor local infrastructure diminishing the interest in integrated inter-agency activities. The weakness resolution analysis showed that development of an adequate infrastructure for safety promotion would require adjustment of the legal framework regulating injury data exchange, and would also require rational financial models for multi-party investments in local infrastructures.

Conclusion: We found that the "silo" structure of government organization and assignment of resources was a barrier to collaborative action for safety at a community level. It may therefore be overly optimistic to take for granted that different approaches to injury control, such as injury prevention and safety promotion, can share infrastructure. Similarly, it may be unrealistic to presuppose that safety promotion can reach its potential in terms of injury rate reductions unless the critical infrastructure for this is in place. Such an alignment of the infrastructure to organizational processes requires more than financial investments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 9, no 45
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-17903DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-45OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-17903DiVA: diva2:212991
Note
Original Publication: Toomas Timpka, Cecilia Nordqvist and Kent Lindqvist , Infrastructural requirements for local implementation of safety policies: the discordance between top-down and bottom-up systems of action, 2009, BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, (9), 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-45 Licensee: BioMed Central http://www.biomedcentral.com/ Available from: 2009-04-30 Created: 2009-04-24 Last updated: 2013-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(288 kB)185 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 288 kBChecksum SHA-512
0719125634b62920f74f87512c81933a12e10fb41a9d2e682ea7d30b371fbabce333d74f8fdd8c8e53ef762f361eaa6df62be852dbf289531d888ef339e51eb7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Timpka, ToomasNordqvist, CeciliaLindqvist , Kent

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Timpka, ToomasNordqvist, CeciliaLindqvist , Kent
By organisation
Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health ScienceFaculty of Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 185 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf