liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Routine screening for risky alcohol consumption at an emergency department using the AUDIT-C questionnaire
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. ( Landstinget i Östergötland; Local Health Care Services in the West of Östergötland; Department of Acute Internal Medicine MH; Närsjukvården i västra Östergötland; Akutmottagningen LiM)
2004 (English)In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, ISSN 0376-8716, Vol. 74, no 1, 71-75 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A questionnaire including the three AUDIT-C items was used to screen for alcohol use among trauma patients. The aim was to display, in a pragmatic way, how the AUDIT-C scores can be converted into different levels and kind of risky drinking. Using AUDIT-C scores with a cut-off score of 4 points for women and 5 for men indicated that 28% of the women and 40% of the men were risky drinkers. When calculating weekly alcohol consumption from the answers in AUDIT-C, 3% of the women and 7% of the men were hazardous and/or harmful drinkers. Regarding heavy episodic drinking 7% of the women and 30% of the men was drinking 72 g alcohol or more at on at least one occasion a month. These results indicate that the AUDIT-C score as such give little information about the pattern of alcohol consumption and that evaluation of risky drinking must be calculated from the three items in order to differentiate between risky drinking in terms of alcohol consumed per week and heavy episodic drinking.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 74, no 1, 71-75 p.
Keyword [en]
AUDIT-C, Increased-risk drinking, Screening, Emergency department, Alcohol consumption
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-13758DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.11.010OAI: diva2:21316
Available from: 2006-01-16 Created: 2006-01-16
In thesis
1. Alcohol screening and simple advice in emergency care: staffs’ attitudes and injured patients’ drinking pattern
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Alcohol screening and simple advice in emergency care: staffs’ attitudes and injured patients’ drinking pattern
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: About 800,000 people are risky drinkers in Sweden and the alcohol consumption has increased around 30% during the last 6 years. In order to counteract the negative effects of drinking there is a need to implement preventive measures at various levels in society. One place where risky drinkers could be identified is the healthcare setting. More than 10% of the visits at emergency departments and 20% of the injuries have been found to be alcohol‐related. So far, very few risky drinkers attending emergency departments receive advice about sensible drinking although there is good research evidence of the efficacy of such advice. Aim: The main aim was to explore the effects of a simple alcohol preventive routine in emergency care on staffs´ attitudes towards alcohol prevention and injury patients´ drinking pattern. Material and methods: A screening and simple advice routine was introduced at the emergency department of Motala County hospital. The staffs´ attitudes were explored by interviews with 12 staff members before the introduction and in 6 follow‐up interviews after a year. All the triage staffs´ attitudes were also measured by a questionnaire before the start of the routine and after 6 months. During the first 6 months of the routine 878 injury patients between 16 and 70 completed an alcohol screening questionnaire. During the next 6 months 647 patients received written advice about sensible drinking after having completed the screening questionnaire. A total of 619 patients included in the 12 months study period were followed‐up by telephone interview and changes in drinking pattern were analyzed. After a further 6 months of intervention a total of 2151 patients had been completing the questionnaire during the total study period of 18 months. The association between drinking pattern and different injury variables was analyzed in order to identify special risk groups and situations. Results: The staff was generally positive to alcohol prevention before the routine started and it was completed as intended. After 6 months of screening the staffs´ role legitimacy and perceived skills had increased. Despite of a further positive change in attitudes towards alcohol prevention the staff was uncertain after the study period whether emergency departments are appropriate settings for alcohol prevention. A total of 9% of the women and 31% of the men attending the emergency department for an injury were defined as risky drinkers. One single item in the questionnaire, concerning frequency of heavy episodic drinking, identified the majority of risky drinkers. In the cohort of patients,who was only screened, 34% was no longer engaged in heavy episodic drinking after 6 months and in the cohort that received written advice in addition to the screening the proportion was 25%. The latter group also increased readiness to change by 14%. The proportion of risky drinkers was higher among injury patients, 21% compared to 15% in the general population in the cathment area. This was mostly explained by a higher proportion of young men in the study group. When drinking pattern was compared, both risky and non‐risky drinkers proved to be significantly more likely than abstainers to be injured in amusement locations, parks, lakes or seas and during play or other recreational activities, when controlling for age and sex. Nine percent of the injury patients reported that they believed that their injury was related to alcohol. Half of this group was non risky‐drinkers. Conclusions: The triage staff performed the intervention as agreed, and in some aspects, which could facilitate further development of alcohol preventive measures, their attitudes changed positively. However, it appears difficult to expect alcohol preventive measures to involve more of the staff’s time than the routine tried, and other practical solutions have to be evaluated. A question about frequency of heavy episodic drinking identified the majority of risky drinkers and could be used as a single screening question. There was a reasonable reduction in heavy episodic drinking among the injury patients. The lack of a control group makes it difficult to fully explain whether this change is a result of the injury per se, the screening and the written advice procedure or a natural fluctuation in the patients´ drinking pattern. More studies are needed in order to establish the minimal levels of intervention in routine care that is accepted by the staff, and has a reasonable effect on risky drinkers’ alcohol consumption.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutionen för hälsa och samhälle, 2005
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 928
Emergency department, alcohol prevention, screening, simple advice, staff, attitudes, injury
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-5440 (URN)91-85497-62-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2005-12-16, Aulan, Hälsans hus, Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Available from: 2006-01-16 Created: 2006-01-16 Last updated: 2009-03-06

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Ph.D. Thesis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordqvist, CeciliaJohansson, KjellBendtsen, Preben
By organisation
Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health ScienceFaculty of Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 82 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link