liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Land use and forestry based CDM in scientific literature pre and post COP 9 in Milan
Department of Earth Science, Physical Geography, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Earth Science, Physical Geography, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4484-266X
Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
2008 (English)In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, ISSN 1567-9764, E-ISSN 1573-1553, no 8, 249-274 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article explores the science-policy interactions between peer-reviewed

literature and decisions and declarations on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry

(LULUCF) projects in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) taken at Conference of

the Parties (COP) meetings. The results are based on a literature analysis capturing 88

articles published from 1997 to 2005. By using a matrix search method and a structured

reading form, the method and analysis focussed on whether issues of CDM and LULUCF

were presented as ‘supportive of the inclusion of LULUCF’ and ‘critical of the inclusion of

LULUCF’. A matrix search method and a structured reading form were applied. Of the 88

articles, 66% included discussions supportive to the inclusion of LULUCF. Forty-nine

percent had a first author affiliated in natural sciences. Only 19% had first authors affiliated

in developing countries while the same number for contributing authors was 38%. The

results show no clear connection between scientific literature and decisions and declarations,

but indicate that policymakers set the research agenda by declarations, while

researchers feed the process up until decisions are made.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. no 8, 249-274 p.
Keyword [en]
CDM, COP, Land-use change, Forestry, Literature study, Negotiations, Policy, Research
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-18091DOI: 10.1007/s10784-008-9074-6OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-18091DiVA: diva2:214695
Available from: 2009-05-06 Created: 2009-05-06 Last updated: 2015-06-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Ostwald, Madelene

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ostwald, Madelene
In the same journal
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 452 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf