liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Alternative arguments and directions for studying performance measurement
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Quality Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Quality Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2009 (English)In: Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, ISSN 1478-3363, E-ISSN 1478-3371, Vol. 20, no 4, 409-421 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to present and discuss alternative arguments and directions for the study of performance measurement. We classify and discuss performance measurement in three phases: the design and structure of the performance measurement system, the implementation of performance measurement, and the utilisation of performance measurement in everyday work. We argue the need for a general approach to the examination of performance measurement in organisations, a perspective that addresses the key questions identified by managers and how they deal with the design, implementation, and usage of performance measurement in real-time settings. Studies of performance measurement in the various three phases are proposed by means of an organisational framework. This framework takes into account internal dimensions, situational/contingency factors, external innovations, dimensions and outcomes. These various dimensions are developed in relation to performance measurement systems analysis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2009. Vol. 20, no 4, 409-421 p.
Keyword [en]
performance measurement systems, performance measures, design, implementation, usage, management, research method
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-18133DOI: 10.1080/14783360902781899ISI: 000265380500004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-18133DiVA: diva2:216423
Available from: 2009-05-08 Created: 2009-05-08 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Elg, MattiasKollberg, Beata

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elg, MattiasKollberg, Beata
By organisation
Quality Technology and ManagementThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf