liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison of different input devices for a 3D environment
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Visual Information Technology and Applications (VITA). Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Visual Information Technology and Applications (VITA). Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2009 (English)In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, ISSN 0169-8141, Vol. 39, no 3, 554-563 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper presents a usability study comparing wand, voice, and two tablet-PC based interfaces across a task requiring three-dimensional surface exploration, information gathering and recall of information. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable interaction interface, among the ones implemented in a three-dimensional environment for Air Traffic Control, for interactive exploration of and gathering information about three-dimensional weather structures. Data concerning time, error rate, number of control actions as well as participants feedback on ease of learning, ease of use, frustration and perceived difficulty of the performed task were collected. The results indicate that the wand interface supported better performance when compared with the other interaction interfaces. Among the four interaction interfaces, the voice interface seems to present several limitations, mostly related to time lag in the voice recognition, which was judged by the subjects as a source of frustration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 39, no 3, 554-563 p.
Keyword [en]
3D interaction, 3D environments, Voice command, Tablet-PC based Interfaces, 6DOF devices, Usability evaluation
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-18281DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.016OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-18281DiVA: diva2:217858
Available from: 2009-05-17 Created: 2009-05-15 Last updated: 2010-12-06

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Thong Dang, NguyenTavanti, MonicaRankin, IvanCooper, Matthew

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Thong Dang, NguyenTavanti, MonicaRankin, IvanCooper, Matthew
By organisation
Department of Science and TechnologyThe Institute of TechnologyVisual Information Technology and Applications (VITA)
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 246 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf