liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Secondary Controlled Swing Drive
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Fluid and Mechanical Engineering Systems . Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering.
2008 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of the thesis has been to design and simulate different concepts of a secondary controlled swing drive for a wheel excavator. Secondary control is a known technology in the field of hydraulics that offers precise positioning as well as the possibility of energy recuperation. Secondary control is today used in certain industrial applications and is rather unemployed in mobile machinery. An excavator moves high loads in cyclic motions which are ideal conditions for energy recuperating systems. A study of the potential of a secondary controlled swing drive is therefore interesting. The focus has been on testing different circuit architectures and emergency brake concepts.

The results of the design process have been three types of circuit architectures and two types of hydraulic safety concepts. The results of the simulation have shown that the open and closed circuit architecture have similar energy efficiency. The closed circuit with low pressure accumulator however offers the best controllability. At least 20% energy savings can be achieved by storing thekinetic energy when braking.

A hydraulic emergency brake must function, independent on the direction of rotation of the excavator during a failure. The first principle recognises the rotation direction and changes the swivel angle of the secondary unit so that a braking torque is created. In the second principle a pressure difference is built up over the secondary unit that always results in a braking torque. Simulationshave shown that the principle with recognition of the speed direction is the most effective safety concept.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 87 p.
Keyword [en]
Secondary Control, Excavator, Energy Recuperation, Hydrostatic Transmission
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-19032ISRN: LIU-IEI-TEK-A--09/00549--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-19032DiVA: diva2:222541
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
teknik
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2009-06-25 Created: 2009-06-09 Last updated: 2009-06-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(5006 kB)5404 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 5006 kBChecksum SHA-512
baa0f2767a408703177f267b2e34a5982c743fc0ffe618e82396f81a9bce2a4b8f4792dbca447130d9809e24d33dbd049fb317644e4951818774591b93909ce1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Karl
By organisation
Fluid and Mechanical Engineering Systems Department of Management and Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5404 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1564 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf