liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Crossing Boundaries: The Ethics of the Pubic/Private Divide in Migrant Domestic Work in Europe
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics. Linköping University.
2009 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

 

The central objective of this thesis is to demonstrate how the concept—or concepts—of the public/private divide actively shapes the conditions of migrant domestic work in Europe. In doing so, I aim to show how European states’ current treatment of migrant domestic work is ethically problematic, and that a sufficient moral response to this dilemma entails a re-evaluation of any operative notions of the public/private distinction.

The premise of my thesis is that migrants working as domestics suffer human rights abuses due to two distinct but inseparable factors: their gender-based mode of employment and their legal status. I will make the claim that states fail to prevent these abuses, and secure the conditions necessary for the fulfillment of migrants’ human rights, because they assume a morally problematic understanding of the public/private distinction. 

In arguing for a re-evaluation of the public/private sphere, I will likewise propose that certain revisions be accordingly made in several levels and domains of legislation—regional and national, as well as labor and immigration. Less concrete, though no less important, is my contention that receiving and sending countries alike need to undertake a more profound re-examination of the moral status of domestic work, and, more fundamentally, care work itself. 

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 75 p.
Keyword [en]
ethics, feminism, migration, domestic work, public and private
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-19155ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--09/03--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-19155DiVA: diva2:223457
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
humaniora/teologi
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2009-06-23 Created: 2009-06-12 Last updated: 2009-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(438 kB)569 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 438 kBChecksum SHA-512
6f0bbde7e779c4a7f9d3e663f475ea792b96a9907ca8db9376e23a0228888b8e504706abc4a9dff4e2c10be036288fb7fbf54737383bad7466e0946e1fea15ff
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
de Dios, Anjeline Eloisa J.
By organisation
Centre for Applied EthicsLinköping University
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 569 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 371 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf