liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Patients with irritable bowel syndrome in primary care appear not to be heavy health care utilisers
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary Care . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0723-139X
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary Care . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Cardiovascular Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg .
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Primary Care . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2006 (English)In: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, ISSN 0269-2813, Vol. 23, no 6, 807-814 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


Irritable bowel syndrome is a frequently diagnosed gastrointestinal condition in general practice. Managing this chronic condition requires a co-ordinated effort between patient and doctor.


To explore the patterns of treatment and healthcare utilization of irritable bowel syndrome cases in a Swedish primary care setting.


All cases with a registered diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome were identified retrospectively for a 5-year period through computerized medical records at three primary healthcare centres in Sweden. Documentation of diagnosis, healthcare visits, treatments, investigations, medications, referrals, laboratory tests, mental and demographic data were retrieved from the records.


Of all 723 irritable bowel syndrome patients identified, only 37% had a follow-up appointment to their General Practitioner during the study period. For 80%, the General Practitioner initiated some treatment during the initial consultation and 75% were prescribed medication. Fibre and bulking laxatives and acid-suppressive drugs were the most common medication. Almost a quarter was referred for complementary investigations at hospital, only 8.9% of the irritable bowel syndrome patients were referred to a specialist investigation. Laboratory investigations varied and were ordered more frequently (P = 0.05) for men.


Irritable bowel syndrome patients appear not to be heavy utilizers of primary care and, of those who attend, the majority are managed by their General Practitioner.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 23, no 6, 807-814 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-13966DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02815.xOAI: diva2:22348
Available from: 2006-09-19 Created: 2006-09-19 Last updated: 2013-09-05
In thesis
1. Irritable bowel syndrome diagnosed in primary care: Occurrence, treatment and impact on everyday life
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Irritable bowel syndrome diagnosed in primary care: Occurrence, treatment and impact on everyday life
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: IBS is the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders and affects approximately 10-20 % of the general population and is widespread in all societies and socio-economic groups. Although the disorder does not have a life-threatening course, it still seriously affects the patients in their everyday life.

Aim: The general aims of this thesis were to estimate the occurrence of irritable bowel syndrome in the general population and to achieve a better understanding of present treatment of this disorder and impact on every-day life in those suffering from IBS.

Material and methods: The LIPS study comprises two parts. Part I was a retrospective register study where the data collection was based on computerised medical records at three selected Primary Health Care centres in a defined region. Part II was a population based case-control study. The identified IBS cases from part I constitute the cases, while their control groups were randomly selected from the population census register in the same area as the cases. Data in part II were collected by means of a postal questionnaire to cases and controls. The study was conducted in Linköping, a city located in the south-east of Sweden with 135 000 inhabitants.

Results: The female IBS patients reported lower influence on planning their work and working hours as well as fewer opportunities to learn new things at their work compared to their controls, even after adjustments in multiple logistic regressions for potential confounders like; mood, sleeping problems and perceived health. The female IBS patients had considerably lower HRQOL in all dimensions compared to their controls, even when compared to male patients. Younger female IBS cases (18-44 years) reported lower mental health on the SF-36 scale than the older IBS female cases (p=0.015). In the multivariate analysis these variables, lack of influence on planning the work, family history of IBS, anxiety and sleeping disturbance displayed an association with being diagnosed with IBS in women. In men, lack of influence on working pace, family history of IBS was associated with an IBS diagnosis.The consultation incidence of IBS in part I was 3.4 (95% CI 3.20-3.70) per 1000 person-years for all IBS cases, among females; the incidence rate was 4.6 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 4.16-4.97) and males; 2.3 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 2.01-2.59). The dominating pharmacological treatment prescribed for abdominal complaints were fibre and bulking laxatives agents as well as acid suppressive drugs. These variables had an independent impact on the probability of a follow-up consultation; diagnosed co-morbidity besides the IBS diagnosis, rectoscopy ordered and laboratory tests ordered.

Conclusions: IBS patients identified in primary care are significantly affected in their working-life compared to individuals in the general population. Especially female IBS-patients report lower decision latitude at work and they also appear to have a particularly impaired psychosocial functioning in their every day life and impaired HRQOL. Factors associated with IBS diagnosis among females are anxiety as well as family history of IBS and lack of co-determination at work.

The incidence rate of IBS was 3.4 per 1000 person-years which increased with age and with an overrepresentation of females. IBS patients did not appear to be heavy utilisers of primary care and those who attended were treated by their GP without further consultation. The strongest predictors for having a follow-up consultation were diagnosed co-morbidity, rectoscopy and laboratory tests ordered

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutionen för hälsa och samhälle, 2006
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 958
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), occurence, treatment, psychosocial factors, psychological factors, working conditions, gender, health-related qualtity of life (HRQOL)
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-7336 (URN)91-85523-09-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2006-10-06, Hälsans Hus, Ingång 16, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Figure on page 8 reprinted from Lancet 360(9332), Nicholas, J Talley and Robin Spiller, "Irritable bowel syndrome: a little understood organic bowel disease?", pp. 555-564, Copyright 2006 with permission from Elsevier. On the day of the public defence of the doctoral thesis, the status of articles III and IV was Submitted.Available from: 2006-09-19 Created: 2006-09-19 Last updated: 2013-09-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Ph.D. thesis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Faresjö (Olsen), ÅshildGrodzinsky, EwaFoldevi, Mats
By organisation
Primary Care Faculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 58 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link