liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transforming the Brute: On the Ethical Acceptability of Creating Painless Animals
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics.
2009 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Transforming the Brute addresses the ethical acceptability of creating painless animals for usage in biomedical experimentation.  In recent decades the possibility of creating genetically decerebrate animals or AMLs for human ends has been discussed in scientific, academic, and corporate communities.  While the ability to create animals that cannot feel, experience, and are more plant than animal remains science fiction, biomedicine may now be able to eliminate or significantly reduce the capacity to feel pain and nociception through genetic engineering.  With this new technology comes the opportunity to vastly increase the welfare of animals used in biomedical experimentation, yet this possibility has largely been ignored by the scientific and academic community.  This work seeks to reveal the moral necessity of creating painless animals for usage in biomedical experimentation for animal welfare ends.  Intrinsic objections relating to animal integrity, rights, companionship, the alteration of telos, humility and virtue are considered.  The benefit of eliminating nociceptive pain in experimental animals is addressed, and differences are examined between biomedical experimentation and other usage of animals for human ends which makes the proposed creation of painless animals ethically unique.  Finally, an argument is presented for the moral necessity of replacing normal animals with painless animals in biomedical experimentation with consideration given to genetically decerebrate animals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 80 p.
Keyword [en]
transforming, brute, nociception, pain, genetic, engineering, manipulation, modification, modify, gene, genes, bernard, rollin, animal, microencephalic, lumps, decerebrate, aml, amls, painless, painlessness, integrity, dignity, rights, companionship, telos, alteration, biomedicine, biomedical, experiment, experimentation, agriculture, farm, suffering, distress, capacity, bioethics, ethics, applied, mice, scn9a, nav1.7, gene, therapy, germ, line
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-19447ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--09/05--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-19447DiVA: diva2:224942
Presentation
IKK 4260, House Key, Linköping University (English)
Uppsok
humaniora/teologi
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2009-06-23 Created: 2009-06-23 Last updated: 2009-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(364 kB)508 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 364 kBChecksum SHA-512
ff5901b97ebc2dde9dc8e6bf6aad7a27a0de199b980031002bd93574e8f96a5afb86bbfea44ee2f488879be0443b7fde3e52e44ab67c57faa9f229f944358231
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Centre for Applied Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 508 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 384 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf