liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Keystone species and vulnerable species in ecological communities: strong or weak interactors?
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Theoretical Biology . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Theoretical Biology . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2005 (English)In: Journal of Theoretical Biology, ISSN 0022-5193, Vol. 35, no 1, 95-103 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The loss of a species from an ecological community can trigger a cascade of secondary extinctions. The probability of secondary extinction to take place and the number of secondary extinctions are likely to depend on the characteristics of the species that is lost—the strength of its interactions with other species—as well as on the distribution of interaction strengths in the whole community. Analysing the effects of species loss in model communities we found that removal of the following species categories triggered, on average, the largest number of secondary extinctions: (a) rare species interacting strongly with many consumers, (b) abundant basal species interacting weakly with their consumers and (c) abundant intermediate species interacting strongly with many resources. We also found that the keystone status of a species with given characteristics was context dependent, that is, dependent on the structure of the community where it was embedded. Species vulnerable to secondary extinctions were mainly species interacting weakly with their resources and species interacting strongly with their consumers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 35, no 1, 95-103 p.
Keyword [en]
Species loss; Keystone species; Interaction strength; Community dynamics; Permanence; Secondary extinction
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-14053DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.022OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-14053DiVA: diva2:22539
Available from: 2006-10-04 Created: 2006-10-04
In thesis
1. Interaction strength and responses of ecological communities to disturbances
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Interaction strength and responses of ecological communities to disturbances
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Ecological communities are continuously exposed to natural or anthropogenic disturbances of varied intensity and frequency. The way communities respond to disturbances can depend on various factors, such as number of species, structural characteristics of the community, stability properties, species characteristics and the nature of the disturbance. This thesis is a collection of theoretical studies on how ecological communities respond to different kind of disturbances, mainly in relation to interaction strength between species, a measure of how strongly or weakly species interact with each other.

A major disturbance for natural communities is the loss of a species. Although species extinctions is a natural process in the geological time scale, it has lately been dangerously accelerated due to human activities and interferences. Extinction of a species can have dramatic consequences for the community, can trigger a cascade of secondary species extinction and can even lead to community collapse. In Paper I, we identify species whose loss can trigger a large number of secondary extinctions (namely keystone species), species that are particularly vulnerable to become extinct following the loss of another species and mechanisms behind the sequence of secondary extinctions. We also highlight the fact that the keystone status of a species can be context dependent, that is, it is dependent on the structure of the community where it is embedded.

Although the global extinction of a species is an irreversible process, in cases of local extinction, conservation and restoration plans can include reintroduction of the species to their former location. Such reintroduction or translocation attempts often fail, due to characteristics of the reintroduced species and to changes in the community structure caused by the initial loss of the species (Paper II ). Using model communities we show that this risk of reintroduction failure can be high - even in cases where the initial species loss did not cause any secondary extinctions - and it differs between attempts to reintroduce weakly or strongly interacting species (Paper II ).

Disturbances are not always as profound as species extinction. Human activities and environmental changes can cause small and permanent changes in birth and mortality rates of species and in the strength of interaction between species. Such disturbances can change the stability properties of ecological communities making them more vulnerable to further disturbances. In Paper III, we derive analytical expressions for the sensitivity of resilience to changes in the intrinsic growth rate of species and in the strength of interaction links. We also apply the method to model communities and identify keystone species and links, i.e. species and links whose small disturbance would cause large changes in community resilience. We found that changes in the growth rate of strongly interacting species have a larger impact on resilience than changes in the growth rate of weakly interacting species, which is in line with the main findings of the species deletion study (Paper I ).

Community complexity - mainly expressed as number of species and links - was one of the first community characteristics to be related to stability properties and the way communities respond to disturbances. Many theoretical works support the hypothesis that complexity reduces stability, contradicting intuition, observation and many experimental studies. In Paper IV, we state that this could be, at least partly, due to methodological misconceptions and misinterpretations. We propose a new sampling method for parameterizing model communities and we highlight the importance of feasibility of model communities (all species densities are strictly positive), for a more proper estimation of stability probability of communities with different degrees of complexity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutionen för fysik, kemi och biologi, 2006. 43 p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 1002
Keyword
Species deletion, secondary extinctions, keystone species, keystone links, species reintroductions, Lotka-Volterra models, local stability, permanence, resilience, sensitivity analysis, diversity, complexity, food webs, competition communities
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-7536 (URN)91-85497-20-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2006-03-03, Planck, Fysikhuset, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2006-10-04 Created: 2006-10-04 Last updated: 2012-11-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Ph.D. thesis

Authority records BETA

Christianou, MariaEbenman, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Christianou, MariaEbenman, Bo
By organisation
Theoretical Biology The Institute of Technology
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf