liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Oropharynx A Means of Showing Nervous Lesions in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring: A Means of Showing Nervous Lesions in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring
Karolinska Hospital.
Fysiol Lab Stockholm.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinical Neurophysiology . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Reconstruction Centre, Department of Neurophysiology UHL.
2009 (English)In: CHEST, ISSN 0012-3692, Vol. 136, no 2, 481-489 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: It is not fully understood why habitual snoring frequently progresses to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Vibrations per se may cause peripheral nerve lesions. Therefore, snoring vibrations could cause nervous lesions, leading to impaired reflex activation of dilating muscles at inspiration. In this study, the methodology for quantitative sensory testing in the oropharynx was developed, and the presence of sensory nerve lesions in patients with OSAS and snoring was evaluated. Methods: Vibration detection thresholds (VDTs) and/or cold detection thresholds (CDTs) were tested at the tonsillar pillars, tongue, lip, and finger in 23 nonsnoring individuals, 13 habitual snorers (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] andlt; 10), and 31 patients with OSAS (AHI andgt; 20). Results: At tonsillar pillars, there were significant gender differences in both VDT and CDT, with women having lower thresholds. VDT showed no significant differences between any of the three groups when men only, were tested. Two nonsnoring control subjects could not detect vibrations at all. When both genders were tested, there was significant difference only between nonsnorers and patients with OSAS (p = 0.003). CDT showed significant differences between nonsnorers and snorers (p = 0.001) and also between nonsnorers and patients with OSAS (p andlt; 0.001), but not between snorers and patients with OSAS. CDT was easier to test than VDT with low variability in nonsnorers. Conclusions: CDT gave more discriminative results than VDT. Signs of sensory nervous lesions were present in the oropharynx of most patients with OSAS and some snorers, supporting the hypothesis of a progressive oropharyngeal nervous lesion. CDT testing could he a useful clinical method to evaluate the degree of oropharyngeal nervous lesions in patients who snore and in those with OSAS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 136, no 2, 481-489 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-20007DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-2747OAI: diva2:232477
Available from: 2009-08-24 Created: 2009-08-24 Last updated: 2009-12-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svanborg, Eva
By organisation
Clinical Neurophysiology Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Neurophysiology UHL
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 24 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link