liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Posterior pelvic pain provocation test is negative in patients with lumbar herniated discs
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Frolunda Specialist Hospital.
Frolunda Specialist Hospital.
Sahlgrens University Hospital.
2009 (English)In: EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, ISSN 0940-6719, Vol. 18, no 7, 1008-1012 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The classification of pelvic girdle pain can only be reached after lumbar causes have been excluded by a clinical examination. During clinical examination, the posterior pelvic pain provocation test is a well-established method for verifying pelvic girdle pain. However, a criticism of pelvic pain provocation tests is that they may have an effect on lumbar structures, thus yielding false-positive results. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test was performed with four groups of patients: patients with computed tomography-verified disc herniations (1) on the waiting list for surgery (14 women; 9 men); (2) 6 weeks after disc surgery (18 women, 12 men); (3) pregnant women seeking care for pelvic girdle pain (n = 25); and (4) women with persistent pelvic girdle pain after delivery (n = 32). The sensitivity of the posterior pelvic pain provocation test was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.89. The positive predictive value was 0.89 and the negative predictive value was 0.87. Analysis of only women showed similar results. In our study, the posterior pelvic pain provocation test was negative in patients with a well-defined lumbar diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation, both before and after disc surgery. Our results are an important step toward the more accurate classification of lumbopelvic pain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 18, no 7, 1008-1012 p.
Keyword [en]
The posterior pelvic pain provocation test; Sensitivity; Specificity; Predictive value of tests; Low back pain
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-20181DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1003-zOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-20181DiVA: diva2:233778
Available from: 2009-09-02 Created: 2009-08-31 Last updated: 2009-09-02

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Gutke, Annelie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gutke, Annelie
By organisation
PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf