liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Matter of Trust?: A Study of Coordination of Swedish Stakeholders in Return-to-Work
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Work and Rehabilitation. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, HELIX Vinn Excellence Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3310-0895
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Sociology.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Work and Rehabilitation. Linköping University, HELIX Vinn Excellence Centre. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. (HELIX Vinn Excellence Centre)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8031-7651
2010 (English)In: Journal of occupational rehabilitation, ISSN 1053-0487, E-ISSN 1573-3688, Vol. 20, 299-310 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction Stakeholder cooperation in return-to-work has been increasingly emphasized over the last years. However, there is a lack of empirical studies on the subject. This study explores different public stakeholders' experiences of participating in Coordination Associations (CAs), a Swedish form of structured cooperation in return-to-work. The aim of the study is to determine the impact of stakeholder interests on the prerequisites for cooperation. Methods Thirty-five representatives from two CAs in eastern Sweden were interviewed regarding the aim, structure and strategies for their common work. Results Stakeholders' actions are to a high degree determined by their institutional preferences and self-interest. In the CAs, the motives for cooperation differ, and although these differences supposedly could be overcome, they are in fact not. One of the stakeholders, the Public Employment Service, limit its interest to coordinating resources, while the other three wishes to engage in elaborated cooperative work forms, implying the crossing of organizational borders. This discrepancy can largely be attributed to the difficulties for representatives from state authorities in changing their priorities in order to make cooperation work. Conclusions Stakeholders' interests have a high impact on the prerequisites for cooperation in return-to-work. By referring to organizational goals, stakeholders engage in non-cooperative behaviour, which threatens to spoil cooperative initiatives and to develop distrust in cooperative work forms. The results of this study expose the complexity of and threats to cooperation, and its conclusions may be used by return-to-work stakeholders in different jurisdictions to improve the possibilities for the development of cooperative structures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SpringerLink , 2010. Vol. 20, 299-310 p.
Keyword [en]
Work ability, Return to work, Cooperation Team, Interdisciplinary
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-21379DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9205-0PubMedID: 19787442OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-21379DiVA: diva2:241173
Available from: 2009-10-01 Created: 2009-10-01 Last updated: 2017-12-05
In thesis
1. In Cooperation We Trust: Interorganizational Cooperation in Return-to-Work and Labour Market Reintegration
Open this publication in new window or tab >>In Cooperation We Trust: Interorganizational Cooperation in Return-to-Work and Labour Market Reintegration
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overarching aim of this thesis is to study Coordination Associations (CAs) as a structure for interor-ganizational cooperation in rehabilitation, return-to-work and labour market reintegration. This has been done through empirical studies of two CAs in eastern Sweden.

Central questions for the thesis are:

  • How have representatives on different hierarchical levels in the participating organizations experi-enced cooperation within the structure of CAs?
  • What influence do different organizational and/or professional preferences have on interorganiza-tional cooperation?

The four studies in this thesis have had different approaches to studying interorganizational cooperation.

Study I was concerned with a specific work form, namely interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams, where the analysis concerned how the different professionals in these teams perceived the common work, and how they interpreted the concept of work ability, which is a central concept for determining eligibility for sickness benefits.

Study II focused on managers and board members of the CAs in order to determine their motives for and commitment to interorganizational cooperation. The analysis was concerned with the organizational identification and the self-interest of each actor, where the issue of trust between representatives from dif-ferent organizations was specifically targeted in the analysis.

Study II focused on managers and board members of the CAs in order to determine their motives for and commitment to interorganizational cooperation. The analysis was concerned with the organizational identification and the self-interest of each actor, where the issue of trust between representatives from dif-ferent organizations was specifically targeted in the analysis.

Study III aimed to elucidate the perspectives of officials in different organizations connected to the CAs regarding both the development of cooperation in the CAs, and how the recent changes in sickness insurance regulations will influence future cooperation.

Study IV focused on different perspectives regarding the concept of work ability among representa-tives from all participating organizations, since changes in sickness insurance regulations have changed the assessment process and therefore also the demands for interorganizational cooperation.

The general methodological approach to the studies in this thesis has been explorative; qualitative methods have been used, involving interviews, focus groups and problem-based group discussions. Inter-views and focus groups have had an open-ended structure, and the material has been analysed through qualitative content analysis.

The aim of the Coordination Associations studied in this thesis has been to bridge the gaps between the participating organizations by promoting consensus through common work forms. However, the re-sults from the studies show that such ambitions are troublesome in highly specialized public organizations. Cooperation in the CAs has to a large extent been organized as collaborative work forms rather than as coordination of existing practices. The collaboration has been based on an idea of consensus, where all organizations were expected to participate on equal terms and find common work forms. Although it has been shown that officials from different organizations can work together, the managerial level’s priorities are more determined by their organizational goals and values, which makes them unwilling to finance collaborative work on a longer term.

Another theme of the thesis is the lack of cooperation between the public rehabilitation system and the employers. The public actors lack knowledge of working conditions, and since the work principle guides the rehabilitation process, it is necessary to incorporate employers into the cooperation to facilitate sustainable return-to-work and labour market reintegration.

A central conclusion of the thesis is that consensus is not a reasonable starting point when designing cooperation structures between public organizations. A sustainable cooperation structure needs to incorpo-rate and coordinate the different actors’ priorities into a long-term cooperation strategy, rather than base the cooperation on vulnerable collaboration projects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2010. 117 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1171
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-54894 (URN)978-91-7393-430-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-05-25, Aulan, Hälsans hus, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-04-20 Created: 2010-04-20 Last updated: 2013-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(465 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 465 kBChecksum SHA-512
fc01fe650af970ec2c8d0655b4039b6d858716b2c19309ab4371e71206ccb7eaadea4ead54a2f033b102a82d21023370cd8d83d967e4ec4eaf6e3210e6b71ecc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Ståhl, ChristianSvensson, TommyPetersson, GunillaEkberg, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ståhl, ChristianSvensson, TommyPetersson, GunillaEkberg, Kerstin
By organisation
Work and RehabilitationFaculty of Health SciencesHELIX Vinn Excellence CentreFaculty of Arts and SciencesSociologyDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
In the same journal
Journal of occupational rehabilitation
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 237 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf