Life cycle assessment of floor care: a comparative study of the Twister™ method and floor care methods using polish and wax
2009 (English)In: Proceedings of EcoDesign 2009: 6th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Sapporo, Japan, 2009Conference paper (Other academic)
This study was initiated by the authors in order to evaluate the Twister™ method’s environmental pros and cons in relation to other traditional floor care methods using polish and wax. This has been ascertained through a Life Cycle Assessment which was conducted within the study. The study has been in co-operation with HTC Sweden AB, the developer of the Twister™ method.
The results show that the elements of the Twister™ method with the greatest environmental impact are the scrubbing machine that is used and the low energy consumption that the Twister™ method requires. The results also show that the Twister™ method has a significantly lower environmental impact than floor care methods using polish or wax. The parts of the Twister™ pad that have the greatest environmental impact are the industrial diamonds and the material that makes up the pad.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sapporo, Japan, 2009.
Life Cycle Thinking, Environmental impact
Engineering and Technology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-21986OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-21986DiVA: diva2:242219
6th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, EcoDesign 2009, 6-9 December in Sapporo, Japan