liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Decisions on Inclusion in the Swedish Basic Health Care Package - Roles of Cost-Effectiveness and Need
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Center for Medical Technology Assessment. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2003 (English)In: Health Care Analysis, ISSN 1065-3058, E-ISSN 1573-3394, Vol. 11, no 4, 301-308 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Inclusion or not of a treatment strategy in the publicly financed health care is really a matter of prioritisation. In Sweden priority setting decisions are governed by law in which it is stated that decisions should be guided by firstly the principle of need and secondly the principle of cost-effectiveness. Objective: The purpose of the paper is to discuss and illustrate the roles of need and cost-effectiveness in decisions on inclusion or not of treatment strategies in the publicly financed health care. Methods: The theoretical backgrounds of need and cost-effectiveness are discussed in short, both with respect to their meaning and to their potential roles in decisions on priority setting. Four treatment strategies, Viagra, Rivastigmine, statins, and lung transplants, are analysed with respect to whether either cost-effectiveness or need, or both, seem to have played a role in the decisions of inclusion or not in the basic health care package. Results: Both need and cost-effectiveness are important and should be important aspects when making decisions on priority setting. From the examples of the four treatment strategies it seems that decisions are almost exclusively made with reference to the principle of need. Conclusions: The most evident conclusion to be drawn from this study is that decisions on priority setting are almost solely based on the principle of need. This implies that the principle of cost-effectiveness is given very little space, which is a problem as this means an obvious risk of inefficient resource use.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. Vol. 11, no 4, 301-308 p.
Keyword [en]
priority setting; basic health care; health care resources; need; cost-effectiveness
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-24092DOI: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000010059.61453.8eISI: 000187536000005Local ID: 3660OAI: diva2:244409
Available from: 2009-10-07 Created: 2009-10-07 Last updated: 2015-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bernfort, Lars
By organisation
Center for Medical Technology AssessmentFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Health Care Analysis
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 62 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link