liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is vascular reactivity in skin predictable?
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Dermatology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venerology in Östergötland.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Instrumentation.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0012-7867
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Dermatology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venerology in Östergötland.
2000 (English)In: Skin research and technology, ISSN 0909-752X, E-ISSN 1600-0846, Vol. 6, no 1, 27-30 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background/aims: Cutaneous microdialysis can be used to follow the pharmacology and metabolism of an inflammatory reaction. It is assumed that an equilibration period compensates for the trauma of catheter insertion. Methods: In the present paper, the vascular reactivity of the skin to histamine was tested using assessment by laser Doppler perfusion imaging. In a group of six subjects, the provocation was preceded by insertion of a microdialysis catheter. In a second control group, histamine provocation alone was performed (six subjects). Results: The vascular response to histamine was greater in the microdialysis catheter group than the control group. The histamine provocation caused a greater response than catheter insertion. Further, there was a correlation between the response to catheter insertion and the histamine provocation. Conclusion: It appears that the insertion and/or presence of a microdialysis catheter increases vascular reactivity to subsequent provocation. The response to catheter insertion may predict skin reactivity in general in the individual subject. (C) Munksgaard, 2000.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2000. Vol. 6, no 1, 27-30 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-24848DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2000.006001027.xLocal ID: 9247OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-24848DiVA: diva2:245171
Available from: 2009-10-07 Created: 2009-10-07 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Wårdell, KarinAnderson, Chris

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wårdell, KarinAnderson, Chris
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesDermatologyDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology in ÖstergötlandThe Institute of TechnologyBiomedical Instrumentation
In the same journal
Skin research and technology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 518 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf