liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A 12-year follow-up of subjects initially sicklisted with neck/shoulder or low back diagnoses
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of health and environment. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of health and environment. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2001 (English)In: Physiotherapy Research International, ISSN 1358-2267, E-ISSN 1471-2865, Vol. 6, no 1, 52-63 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and Purpose Neck/shoulder and low back pain are common in the Western world and can cause great personal and economic consequences, but so far there are few long term follow-up studies of the consequences of back pain, especially studies that separate the location of back pain. More knowledge is needed about different patterns of risk factors and prognoses for neck/shoulder and low back pain, respectively, and they should not be treated as similar conditions. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible long-term differences in neck/shoulder and low back symptoms, experienced over a 12-year period, with regard to work status, present health, discomfort and influence on daily activities.

Method A retrospective cohort study of individuals sicklisted with neck/shoulder or low back diagnoses 12 years ago was undertaken. Included were all 213 people who, in 1985, lived in the municipality of Linköping, Sweden, were aged 25–34 years and who had taken at least one new period of sickleave lasting >28 days with a neck/shoulder or low back diagnosis. In 1996, a questionnaire was mailed to the 204 people who were still resident in Sweden (response rate 73%).

Results Those initially absent with neck/shoulder diagnoses rated their present state of discomfort as worse than those sicklisted with low back diagnoses. Only 4% of the neck/shoulder group reported no present discomfort compared with 25% of the low back group. Notably, both groups reported the same duration of low back discomfort during the last year, which may indicate a higher risk for symptoms in more than one location for subjects with neck/shoulder problems.

Conclusions Individuals with sickness absence of more than 28 days with neck/shoulder or low back diagnoses appear to be at high risk of developing long-standing symptoms, significantly more so for those initially having neck/shoulder diagnoses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 6, no 1, 52-63 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-25754DOI: 10.1002/pri.213Local ID: 10188OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-25754DiVA: diva2:246302
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Neck Pain: Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Treatment Effects
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Neck Pain: Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Treatment Effects
2001 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Neck pain is a highly prevalent and often long-lasting problem with substantial personal and economic consequences. Individuals with neck pain are often referred for physiotherapy treatment, but there is limited evidence of the effect of treatment in these patients, mainly because conservative interventions have not been studied in sufficient detail.

The aim of the research underlying this thesis was to improve existing knowledge about neck pain, focusing on prognoses and on the effects of physiotherapy treatment in patients with neck pain. The thesis includes four different studies. a 12-year follow-up study comparing individuals initially on sick leave due to neck/shoulder or low back diagnoses; a critical review of the literatme on randomised studies of neck pain: a prognostic study with focus on both an impairment and a disability outcome at 1-year follow-up: and a randomised study comparing active exercise and McKenzie treatment with a placebo therapy in patients with neck pain.

Compatison of individuals with neck/shoulder and low-back diagnoses revealed that the neck/shoulder group rated their present discomfort as worse than those sick listed with low back diagnoses. Only 4% of the neck/shoulder group but 25% of the low back group reported no present discomfort. Notably. both groups reported the same duration of low back discomfort dming the last year, which may indicate a higher risk for symptoms in more than one location in subjects with neck/shoulder problems.

The regression analyses identified different prognostic factors, except duration of cunent episode, depending on the focus of outcomes. Other factors for the dependent variable pain intensity were Oswestry score and similar problem during the previous 5 years: adjusted R~ was 0.24. For the dependent variable Oswestry score. the other factors were pain intensity. well being, and expectations of treatment; adjusted R2 was 0.32. Using pain intensity as outcome, 60% of the patients were identified as being at risk of poor outcome: the corresponding value for Oswestry score as outcome was only 20%.

In the critical review. twenty-seven studies were analysed, most of them of poor quality: only one-third scored≥ 50 on a scale of I 00. Positive outcome was noted for 18 of the studies. Inclusion criteria, intervention, and outcome were based mainly on impainnent in the analysed studies, thus there is a lack of evidence of treatment effect in patients with neck pain measured with outcomes focusing on functional limitation and disability.

In the randomised study, significant improvements were recorded at 12-month follow-up for all three groups in regard to the main outcomes pain intensity and Neck Disability Index. with no significant difference between the groups. In all, 79% reported that they were better or completely restored after treatment. although 51% reported constant/daily pain. The slope of recovery differed during the first three weeks, with more rapid improvement in the McKenzie group. Only 30% of the study population consumed additional health care. although the mean nmnber of visits were lowest in the McKenzie group.

Individuals with sickness absence > 28 days due to neck/shoulder or low back diagnoses appear to be a high risk group for developing long-standing symptoms with stronger evidence for the neck/shoulder group. In clinical settings, it is important to take treatment goals into consideration when choosing the outcome, since a pain-free result may be difficult to obtain if the problems have been long-lasting. Despite a lack of definite evidence. there was a tendency toward better outcome at short-term follow-up with the two active treatments than with placebo therapy, in regard to both impainnent and disability outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2001. 61 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 662
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-28051 (URN)12814 (Local ID)91-7219-763-3 (ISBN)12814 (Archive number)12814 (OAI)
Public defence
2001-03-16, Berzeliussalen, Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2012-09-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Kjellman, GörelÖberg, BirgittaAlexanderson, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kjellman, GörelÖberg, BirgittaAlexanderson, Kristina
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of health and environment
In the same journal
Physiotherapy Research International
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 133 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf