liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge of and attitudes towards infertility held by members of two county councils in Sweden
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Obstetrics and gynecology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Surgery in Östergötland.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Obstetrics and gynecology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Surgery in Östergötland.
2000 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 79, no 11, 1015-1020 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. To investigate Swedish county council members knowledge of the laws regulating infertility treatment, their understanding of the suggestions put forward in the report 'Priorities in Health Care' and their attitudes towards infertility. Methods. All members (n= 182) of the 1998 county councils of Linkoping and Jonkoping were asked to participate in the study. In total, 153 answered the questionnaire. Results. Different age groups did not show different levels of knowledge. Similarly, there was no significant difference between men and women concerning their knowledge of infertility laws. Furthermore, those committee members who were very positive towards infertility treatment did not have any better knowledge of such treatment than those who were less positive. The men and women who themselves had previously had or were dealing with infertility problems at the time of the survey (12 per cent) displayed the same level of knowledge as the other council members. They also expressed similar attitudes. The members showed very little familiarity with the priority groups suggested in the report from the Health Care Priority Committee. For example, only 18 per cent knew that this committee in priority group III placed infertility treatment and investigation. 31.3 per cent answered that infertility was placed in group V, a group that does not exist. The majority stated that they had a positive attitude towards the treatment of infertility. This is indicated, for example, by their rejection of the statement 'it's [infertility is] a luxury problem'. Conclusions. The relative lack of knowledge of Swedish law and of the report from the Health Care Priority Committee might lead to a lower level of commitment to dealing with the problems that infertile couples face than if the members were better informed. In other words, this lack of knowledge might influence the decisions of the county council members.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2000. Vol. 79, no 11, 1015-1020 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-25992DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.0790111015.xLocal ID: 10444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-25992DiVA: diva2:246540
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Kjellberg, SvanteSydsjö, Gunilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kjellberg, SvanteSydsjö, Gunilla
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesObstetrics and gynecologyDepartment of Surgery in Östergötland
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 147 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf