liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emotional, physical, and sexual abuse in patients visiting gynaecology clinics: a Nordic cross-sectional study
Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Department of Gynaecology, St Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup; and Center for Victims of Sexual Assault, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2003 (English)In: The Lancet, ISSN 0140-6736, E-ISSN 1474-547X, Vol. 361, no 9375, 2107-2113 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Abuse against women causes much suffering for individuals and is a major concern for society. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of three types of abuse in patients visiting gynaecology clinics in five Nordic countries, and to assess the frequency with which gynaecologists identify abuse victims.

Methods

We did a cross-sectional, multicentre study of women attending five departments of gynaecology in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. We recruited 4729 patients; 3641 (77%) responded and were included in the study. Participants completed a postal questionnaire (norvold abuse questionnaire) confidentially. Primary outcome measures were prevalences of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and whether abused patients had told their gynaecologist about these experiences. We assessed differences between countries with Pearson's χ2 test.

Findings

The ranges across the five countries of lifetime prevalence were 38–66% for physical abuse, 19–37% for emotional abuse, and 17–33% for sexual abuse. Not all abused women reported current ill-effects from the abusive experience. Most women (92–98%) had not talked to their gynaecologist about their experiences of abuse at their latest clinic visit.

Interpretation

Despite prevalences of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse being high in patients visiting gynaecology clinics in the Nordic countries, most victims of abuse are not identified by their gynaecologists. This lack of discussion might increase the risk of abused patients not being treated according to their needs. Gynaecologists should always consider asking their patients about abuse.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 361, no 9375, 2107-2113 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26583DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13719-1Local ID: 11148OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-26583DiVA: diva2:247132
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Prevalence of gender violence: studies of four kinds of abuse in five Nordic countries
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Prevalence of gender violence: studies of four kinds of abuse in five Nordic countries
2003 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background

Abuse against women causes much suffering for the individual and is a major public health problem. The general aims of the present studies were I. to validate the NorVold Abuse Questionnaire (NorAQ) in a randomised population sample, and 2. to estimate the prevalence of emotional, physical and sexual abuse and abuse in the health care system by means of NorAQ in seven Nordic gynaecology and one Swedish population sample.

Methods

In the validation study, data were collected in two steps. (I) NorAQ was sent to a random sample of 1923 women in Östergötland. (2) A subsample of 64 women filled in the NorAQ for a second time and were interviewed. The interview had open questions about abuse and was considered our gold standard. In the prevalence studies, NorAQ was sent to 6729 women visiting seven departments of gynaecology in Denmark (1), Finland (1), Iceland (1), Norway (1) and Sweden (3). The main outcome measures were prevalence rates of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and abuse in the health care system, current suffering from abuse and cmmmmication of a history of abuse to the gynaecologist.

Findings

The 13 questions in NorAQ concerning experiences of abuse had satisfactory validity and reliability. The response rate was 67-85% at the clinics and 61% in the Swedish population sample. In general the participants did not feel uncomfortable when answering NorAQ. We found differences in lifetime prevalence of the four kinds of abuse as defined by NorAQ among the Nordic cmmtries: emotional abuse 19-37%; physical abuse 38-66%; sexual abuse 17-33%; abuse in the health care system 13-28%. In Sweden, the lifetime prevalence of abuse was in clinical and population samples: emotional abuse 17-21 %; physical abuse 32-38%; sexual abuse 16-17%; abuse in the health care system 14-20%. There were generally no differences in prevalence rates of abuse among the four Swedish samples, except for abuse in the health care system, which was more commonly reported in the clinical sample of Linköping than in the population sample of Östergötland. Not all abused women reported current suffering from the abusive experience. To estimate prevalence of such abuse that causes current suffering is a new approach. Childhood experiences of emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse were associated with adult experiences of abuse in the health care system. Yet two thirds of women who felt abused in the health care system as adult had no history of earlier abuse. Most women had not talked to the gynaecologist about their experiences of abuse at their latest visit to the clinic.

Conclusion

The questions about abuse in NorAQ had good validity and reliability. We found high prevalences of all four kinds of abuse. Prevalence estimates are highly sensitive to methodology issues and must be related to a specified definition of abuse. Prevalence of abuse causing current suffering was considerably lower than the mere occurrence rates for all fom kinds of abuse. In general, women had not discussed a background of abuse with the gynaecologist at their latest visit to the clinic. Experiences of emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse in childhood were associated with adult abuse in the health care system. Yet the majority of our cases were not victims of childhood abuse. Both findings call for attention and further exploration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2003. 75 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 794
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26670 (URN)11236 (Local ID)91-7373-486-1 (ISBN)11236 (Archive number)11236 (OAI)
Public defence
2003-06-04, Aulan, Hälsans Hus, Hälsouniversitet, Linköping, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2012-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Wijma, BarbroSwahnberg, Katarina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wijma, BarbroSwahnberg, Katarina
By organisation
Department of Molecular and Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
The Lancet
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 100 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf