liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Postoperative pain relief following intrathecal bupivacaine combined with intrathecal or oral clonidine
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden .
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu University Hospital, Estonia.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden .
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden .
2002 (English)In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 46, no 7, 806-814 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic and adverse effects of equal doses of oral or intrathecal clonidine in spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine plain.

Methods: Forty-five ASA I-III orthopaedic patients scheduled for osteosynthesis of a traumatic femur fracture were randomised in a double-blind fashion to one of 3 groups. Patients received 15 mg of plain bupivacaine intrathecally (group B) or an intrathecal mixture of bupivacaine 15 mg and clonidine 150 mg (group CIT). In group CPO oral clonidine 150 mg was administered 60 min before intrathecal injection of bupivacaine 15 mg.

Results: Oral and intrathecal clonidine prolonged the time until the first request for analgesics, 313 ± 29 and 337 ± 29 min, respectively, vs. 236 ± 27 min in group B (P < 0.01). The total 24- h PCA morphine dose was significantly lower in group CIT(19.3 ± 1.3 mg) compared to groups B and CPO(33.4 ± 2.0 and 31.2 ± 3.1 mg). MAP was decreased significantly during the first hour after intrathecal clonidine(14%) and during the first 5 h after oral clonidine(14–19%). HR decreased in CIT during the 5th and 6th postoperative hours(7–9%) and during the first 2 h(9%) in CPO (P < 0.01). The degree of sedation was more pronounced in group CPO during the first 3 h. Four patients had pruritus in group B.

Conclusions: Addition of intrathecal clonidine prolonged analgesia and decreased morphine consumption postoperatively more than oral clonidine. Hypotension was more pronounced after oral than after intrathecal clonidine. Intrathecal clonidine is therefore recommended.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. Vol. 46, no 7, 806-814 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26858DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460709.xLocal ID: 11476OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-26858DiVA: diva2:247408
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2012-11-01
In thesis
1. Perioperative effects of systemic or spinal clonidine as adjuvant during spinal anaesthesia
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Perioperative effects of systemic or spinal clonidine as adjuvant during spinal anaesthesia
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aim of study: To evaluate the effects of different doses of clonidine administered systemically or spinally in combination with local anaesthetics on sensory and motor block intraoperatively, on pain relief postoperatively, and on the incidence of postoperative alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in alcohol abusers.

Patients and methods: A total 285 patients were included in five studies. In two studies, oral clonidine (150 and 300 µg) or intrathecal clonidine (100 and 150 µg) was combined with local anaesthetics to evaluate the quality of sensory and motor block and postoperative analgesia. In a third study, the ant-idelirious effect of a single dose of clonidine (150 µg) given orally or intrathecally before operation was studied in 45 heavy alcohol abusers (daily ethanol intake of at least 60 g). The combination oflow doses of clonidine (15 and 30 µg) intrathecally with low dose bupivacaine was investigated during ambulatory herniorrhaphy. In a combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia study, a moderate dose of postoperative epidural clonidine (40 µg/h) was studied with or without low dose intrathecal clonidine (15µg); plain local anaesthetic was used as control. Sensory block was assessed by pin-prick, light touch, thermotest and transcutaneous electric stimulation; motor block was estimated by a modified Bromage scale. Pain intensity according to a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and analgesic request were recorded. AWS was assessed by the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Results: Intraoperatively, high doses of oral or intrathecal clonidine added to local anaesthetics almost doubled the time of sensory and motor block, and it was possible to reduce the dose of local anaesthetics without diminishing of the quality of spinal anaesthesia. Low doses of clonidine (15 µg) in combination with a low dose of bupivacaine significantly increased the spread of analgesia (4 dermatomes) without significantly prolonging the motor block. The same dose of clonidine combined with a high dose of bupivacaine significantly prolonged the sensory- and motor block by 36% and 18%, respectively Postoperatively, both oral and intrathecal clonidine prolonged time to first analgesic request. V AS score was acceptably low in all study groups. However, a high dose (150 µg) of intrathecal clonidine reduced postoperative 24-hour morphine consumption by 40% compared with control, while morphine-sparing was 55% when a low dose (15 µg) of intrathecal clonidine was combined with epidural clonidine. In ambulatory practice, low doses of intrathecal clonidine decreased analgesic requirements at home for up to 24 h after operation. In comparison with diazepam premedication, clonidine 150 µg, intrathecally or orally, reduced the incidence and degree of postoperative AWS in alcohol-dependent men (from 80 to 10%). The major side-effects of clonidine were hypotension and sedation, especially after oral administration. This hypotensive effect was also found after epidural clonidine infusion.

Conclusion: Clonidine, as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics, provided a higher quality of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia and prevented postoperative alcohol withdrawal syndrome in alcohol abusers. Side effects such as hypotension and pronounced sedation postoperatively should be kept in mind if high doses of clonidine are used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2004. 58 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 859
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-24053 (URN)3611 (Local ID)91-7373-830-1 (ISBN)3611 (Archive number)3611 (OAI)
Public defence
2004-10-08, Wilandersalen, Universitetssjukhuset, Örebro, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Available from: 2009-10-07 Created: 2009-10-07 Last updated: 2012-11-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Dobrydnjov, Igor

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dobrydnjov, Igor
In the same journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 167 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf