liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Major and minor axes of the normal mitral annulus
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Clinical Physiology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart Centre, Department of Clinical Physiology.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Clinical Physiology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart Centre, Department of Clinical Physiology.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Clinical Physiology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart Centre, Department of Clinical Physiology.
2001 (English)In: Journal of Heart Valve Disease, ISSN 0966-8519, E-ISSN 2053-2644, Vol. 10, no 2, 146-152 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aim of the study: A dilated or abnormally shaped mitral annulus is a common cause of mitral valve regurgitation, and may be cured by annuloplastic surgery. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the diagnostic technique of choice. Our aim was to evaluate and suggest two-dimensional TEE reference values from a standardized procedure of measuring the mitral annular major and minor axes, and their cyclic changes. Methods: The annulus was approximated elliptic in the horizontal plane. The intercommissural (IC, major axis) and anteroposterior (AP, minor axis) distances were measured at end-systole (ES), at maximal valve opening (MO), and at end-diastole (ED) from a mid-esophageal view, in 13 men and eight women with normal echocardiographic findings. Indexed values and reproducibility were calculated. Results: The success rate was 100% at ES, 90% at MO, and 29% at ED. ES distances were largest (p <0.001) and most reproducible (5-5.9%). Body weight, but not height or age, had a significant impact. ES 95% prediction intervals for IC were 27 to 46 mm (16-23 mm/m2) and 22 to 36 mm (13-18 mm/m2) for AP (p <0.001). Corresponding body weight-corrected intervals were 0.39 to 0.59 (IC) and 0.32 to 0.48 (AP) mm/kg. No subject had IC:AP <1.1 together with an AP >0.45 mm/kg. Conclusion: Among measurements made at ES, MO and ED, those at ES provided the most reproducible results, and high-quality images were obtained in normal, non-obese subjects. The distances should be judged in relation to body weight or surface area and each other. The largest IC distance and the most elliptic shape were at ES, while the annulus was minimal at ED. The procedure and normal ranges presented may contribute to the evaluation of patients with mitral regurgitation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 10, no 2, 146-152 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26882Local ID: 11505OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-26882DiVA: diva2:247432
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Fyrenius, AnnaEngvall, JanJanerot Sjöberg, Birgitta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fyrenius, AnnaEngvall, JanJanerot Sjöberg, Birgitta
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesClinical PhysiologyDepartment of Clinical Physiology
In the same journal
Journal of Heart Valve Disease
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 104 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf