liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dementia in Primary Care: Why the Low Detection Rate?
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, General Practice. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, General Practice. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Neuroscience and Locomotion, Geriatrics. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2001 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, ISSN 0281-3432, E-ISSN 1502-7724, Vol. 19, no 3, 194-198 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective - The aim of the present study was to find reasons for the low detection rate of dementia in primary care. Another aim was to investigate the attitudes and knowledge on dementia among Swedish general practitioners (GPs).

Design - Two-hundred-and-twenty-eight postal questionnaires were distributed to GPs in the county of Östergötland. Setting - Primary care in Sweden.

Main outcome measures - The opinions of GPs on dementia management in primary care.

Results - The response rate was 67%. GPs showed a good knowledge of dementia diseases but underestimated the occurrence of dementia. They presented a positive attitude towards managing patients with dementia and considered that existing drug therapy justified an active search for patients with dementia in primary care, but they believed the efficacy of the drugs to be limited. Assessing the social environment of patients and organising social support were regarded as the most difficult tasks in the management of demented patients.

Conclusion - The study indicates that the main obstacles are a lack of resources and a sceptical attitude to the benefits of drug treatment. Co-operation between the community services, specialist clinics and the primary care team should be improved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 19, no 3, 194-198 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-26888DOI: 10.1080/028134301316982469Local ID: 11512OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-26888DiVA: diva2:247438
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2012-09-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Dementia and Mental Disorders Among the Elderly in Primary Care
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dementia and Mental Disorders Among the Elderly in Primary Care
2001 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The main pmpose of the present thesis was to investigate how elderly patients with dementia and mental disorders were managed in primary care. The prevalence of the disease was investigated, to what extent the patients and their disorders were detected and treated and the approach of general practitioners toward patients with dementia.

Patients aged 70 years and above visiting a primary care centre (PCC) in Linköping (N=1225) were examined with a Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). In a subsample (N=350) a comprehensive neuro psychiatric examination and an interview with a close informant were conducted. All medical records (N=350) in the PCC were reviewed regarding diagnoses, medication and the number of visits to the centre. Dementia and mental disorders were diagnosed according to DSM-III-R. A postal questionnaire was sent out to all general practitioners (GPs) in the county of Östergötland (N=228) to gain information about their situation and attitudes regarding patients with dementia.

Using the traditional cut-off score of 23/24 points in the MMSE, revealed in a considerable under-diagnosing of demented patients in this study, leaving more than 70% of mild cases and 30% of moderate cases undetected. When using a cut-off score of 26/27 good criterion validity was found. There was excellent agreement between the testing by the social worker at the PCC and the GP in the patient's home.

The prevalence of dementia and mental disorder according to the psychiatdc interview was 33% (16% dementia, 17% mental disorders) The frequency of psychiatric symptoms among those with no mental disorder was up to 66%.

Dementia was detected in 25% of cases, depression in 12% of cases and anxiety in 30% of cases. The most common psychiatric diagnosis according to medical records was sleep disorder. Patients with dementia were older, had more other diagnoses as well as medication. Patients with mental disorder had more visits to the PCC.

The GPs underestimated the occurrence of dementia among elderly in PCC. They presented a positive attitude to managing patients with dementia and considered that existing dmg therapy justified an active search for patients with dementia in primary care. Assessment of patients' social enviromnent and the organisation of social support were regarded as the most difficult tasks in the management of demented patients.

The prevalence of dementia and mental disorders in an elderly PCC population is high. As the major problem in the management of dementia and mental disorder has been under-detection, MMSE as an opportunistic screening tool for cognitive function in this group is recommended.

The formation of an effective network, to manage the continuing care of patients with dementia is essential, and a dementia co-ordinator at the PCC would be preferable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2001. 57 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 680
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-27532 (URN)12189 (Local ID)91-7219-976-8 (ISBN)12189 (Archive number)12189 (OAI)
Public defence
2001-05-31, Administrationsbyggnadens aula, Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2012-09-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Foldevi, MatsMarcusson, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Foldevi, MatsMarcusson, Jan
By organisation
General PracticeFaculty of Health SciencesGeriatrics
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 192 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf