liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effect of contrast on systolic myocardial ultrasound color-Doppler velocity.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Clinical Physiology. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart Centre, Department of Clinical Physiology.
2001 (English)In: Proceedings to IEEE Engineering Med & Biol(CD skiva),2001, IEEE , 2001, Vol. 4, 3289-3291 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Intravenously distributed ultrasound contrast increases echoes from the normally low echogenic bloodpool and myocardial perfusion imaging is developing. However the microspheres used are potential endothelial stimulators as well as nonlinear scatterers. Tissue Doppler is developed to detect velocities of myocardial motion, which are in the same range as perfusion flow velocities. The effect of contrast is not evaluated. We performed echocardiography in 12 patients with ischemic heart disease before and immediately after a slow intravenous infusion of 27 ml Optison® using color myocardial Doppler imaging (GE Vingmed systemV). Longitudinal basal systolic velocities and their integrals were analyzed in digitally stored cineloops. Peak mean velocity increased 10% by contrast from mean 5.2 ± 1.8 (SD) to 5.7 ± 2.3 cm/s (p=0.02, confidence interval 2-16%) but integral did not change (0.8 ± 0.4 cm). Contrast has no effect on blood pressure or heart rate in used dose. It is therefore of interest to further evaluate if this increase in velocity; a) is a methodological effect that may be used to detect contrast within myocardium (and thereby perfusion/blood volume), or b) is secondary to increased flow and motion caused by endothelial and vascular effects from the contrast microspheres. Either have important methodological, physiological and clinical impact.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE , 2001. Vol. 4, 3289-3291 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-27396DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019527Local ID: 12048ISBN: 0-7803-7211-5 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-27396DiVA: diva2:247948
Conference
23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 25-28 October 2001, Istanbul, Turkey
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2015-09-29

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Janerot-Sjöberg, Birgitta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Janerot-Sjöberg, Birgitta
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesClinical PhysiologyDepartment of Clinical Physiology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf