liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning risk and constructing social identity - achieving trust and cooperation in the railway system
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change.
2002 (English)In: European Assocation for the Social Studies of Science and Technology,2002, 2002, 115-115 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Risk is constructed differently within different communities of practice in the railway system. However, the different communities such as train drivers, train traffic controllers and infrastructure maintenance workers must communicate and cooperate in order to achieve safe traffic. The paper focuses on how risks, situated knowledge, social class and professional identities are co-produced during interaction, as well as shaping interaction, within and between different communities of practice in the railway system. In interaction, trust and mutual understanding, or mistrust and misunderstanding, is displayed and acknowledged. Risk objects are those phenomena that the participants of the different communities of practice learn to connect causally to specific risks. Risk objects and their associated risks are in turn connected to specific risk handling techniques, together constituting common repertoires of safe working practices. Four different kinds of problems will be highlighted in the paper. 1. Risks are constructed differently: some are seen as manageable within the range of existing repertoires of safe working practices, others are seen as acceptable pending production pressures, still other are purposely produced as part of the reproduction of specific masculine identities. 2. Different communities learn to identify risk objects that are linked to risks and accidents. Differences in knowledge about and engagement in the practices that other communities are dealing with may undermine the conditions for successful risk handling. 3. The repertoires of risk objects and risk handling techniques that workers learn are sometimes difficult to reconcile with risk management schedules, regulations and the official priorities for maintenance work, causing mistrust and disrespect for management. 4. A successful risk handling can be hampered by the partition of the market for maintenance work: the diffusion of experiences between different companies is delimited due to trade secrets and fear of loosing contracts if incidents are revealed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. 115-115 p.
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-28685Local ID: 13846OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-28685DiVA: diva2:249496
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Sanne, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sanne, Johan
By organisation
Faculty of Arts and SciencesTechnology and Social Change
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf