liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Is there a pattern in European bus and coach incidents? A literature analysis with special focus on injury causation and injury mechanisms
Umeå Universitetet.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Neuroscience and Locomotion, Rehabilitation Medicine. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Paediatric Habilitation Community Service.
2005 (English)In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, ISSN 0001-4575, Vol. 37, no 2, 225-233 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In order to identify and describe a pattern in bus and coach incident related injuries and fatalities, and to suggest possible future measures for improvement of bus and coach safety, a literature analysis was performed. The results formed a multi-faceted pattern, which briefly can be described as follows, women travelled more frequently by bus as compared to men. Injuries sustained predominantly affected women 60 years of age and older. Of all traffic fatalities in Europe, bus and coach fatalities represented 0.3-0.5%. In the OECD countries, the risk of being killed or seriously injured was found to be seven to nine times lower for bus and coach occupants as compared to those of car occupants. Despite the fact that fatalities were more frequent on rural roads, a vast majority of all bus and coach casualties occurred on urban roads and in dry weather conditions. Boarding and alighting caused about one-third of all injury cases. Collisions were a major injury-contributing factor. Buses and coaches most frequently collided with cars, but unprotected road users were hit in about one-third of all cases of a collision, the point of impact on the bus or the coach being typically frontal or side. Rollovers occurred in almost all cases of severe coach crashes. In this type of crash projection, total ejection, partial ejection, intrusion and smoke inhalation were the main injury mechanisms and among those, ejection being the most dangerous. A 2-point belt may prevent passenger ejection, but in frontal crashes when the upper abdominal parts and the head hit the seatback in front, it could, however, contribute to head and thoracic injuries. Hence, a 3-point belt provides the best restraint in rollovers and frontal crashes. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 37, no 2, 225-233 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-30331DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.03.006Local ID: 15867OAI: diva2:251153
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2011-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Torbjörn
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesRehabilitation MedicinePaediatric Habilitation Community Service
In the same journal
Accident Analysis and Prevention
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 47 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link