liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of a problem-based learning rehabilitation programme on quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Cardiology. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Internal Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Department of Caring Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Cardiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2005 (English)In: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, ISSN 1474-5151, E-ISSN 1873-1953, Vol. 4, no 4, 324-330 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The aim of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is not only physical improvement but also increased quality of life (QoL). A CR programme based upon problem based learning (PBL) philosophy was developed, to achieve and apply new knowledge related to coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this paper was to evaluate the impact of the PBL programme on QoL.

Methods: 207 consecutive patients < 70 years of age with a recent event of CAD were randomised to a PBL group (n = 104) or a control group (n = 103). In addition to standard treatment, the PBL patients participated in 13 group sessions during 1 year, where individual learning needs and behavioural changes were focused upon. QoL was measured by the Ladder of Life, Self-Rated Health (SRH), SF 36, and Cardiac Health Profile (CHP).

Results: Significant differences between the groups, favouring the PBL patients, were found by global instruments: more optimistic expectations of the future QoL and a better general condition. No differences were found by SRH, SF 36 or subscales of CHP, but QoL increased in both groups during the year.

Conclusions: The main outcome was that QoL improved in both groups with some effects favouring the PBL programme.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 4, no 4, 324-330 p.
Keyword [en]
Coronary artery disease, Cardiac rehabilitation, Problem-based learning, Quality of life
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-31058DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.04.008Local ID: 16778OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-31058DiVA: diva2:251881
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Problem-based learning in the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Problem-based learning in the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background and aims: A well-informed patient is a prerequisite for adherence to lifestyle changes and drug treatments, which improve prognosis of CAD. Problem-based learning (PBL) is in line with principles of adult learning. The aim was to develop and evaluate a PBL rehabilitation programme for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.

The PBL model: In the PBL programme, 6-9 patients and a tutor met ftrst at 9 (I), and after revision at 13 (III and IV) sessions during a one year period. Learning needs related to CAD, its treatment, psychosocial issues, and behavioural changes were focused upon.

Subjects and methods: To validate the PBL programme, six tutors were interviewed, seven PBL groups were videotaped, and 44 other patients answered a questionnaire (I). To evaluate the validity of the MTI/CSA activity monitor, as a means of measuring physical activity intensity, 34 patients walked on a treadmill at three different speeds. Indirect calorimetry was used to determine energy expenditure (EE) (11). In order to evaluate the effects of the PBL programme (III and IV), 207 patients (55% of all eligible), were randomised to the PBL programme (n=104) or to a control group (n=103). All patients received standard therapy. Physical activity was measured by interview and by the activity monitor, and quality of life by the Ladder of Life, Self-rated Health, Cardiac Health Profile, and SF-36. All measurements were performed before randomisation and at the end of the programme.

Results: The PBL-model could be incorporated into the clinical routine with a high participation rate. Initial problems with the tutor role and the structured problem-solving process in the group-work were revealed, which led to revision of the model. PBL stimulated participants to search actively for knowledge, while remaining to fmd demands adequate and being positive about the education. According to self-reports, lifestyle changes had been performed (I). The MTI/CSA activity monitor was a valid tool for quantifying both amount and intensity of physical activity during walking (II). The PBL programme did not affect physical activity. No increase in activity was found in any of the groups over the one year period Activity, as measured by the activity monitor, was lower than recommended in guidelines for secondary prevention (III). On the contrary, self-reports indicated higher and adequate physical activity. The PBL programme seemed to have positive effects on quality of life, as measured by global instruments. No effects were found on health-related or disease specific aspects of quality of life (IV).

Conclusion: The PBL programme was feasible to run in clinical practice. Education of tutors was crucial and required time. The programme stimulated participants to become active learners. The PBL model had no effects on physical activity, but some effects on global quality of life. Physical activity remained unchanged and low in both groups, as measured by the activity monitor, which was a useful and reliable tool, while self-reports seemed to overestimate performed physical activity. Quality of life improved in both groups over the year. More data are needed to evaluate the usefulness of the PBL-model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpin Universitet, 2005. 65 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 890
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-31915 (URN)17748 (Local ID)91-7373-869-7 (ISBN)17748 (Archive number)17748 (OAI)
Public defence
2005-04-29, Berzeliussalen, Hälsouniversitetet, Linköping, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Note

2005

Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2012-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Tingström, PiaBergdahl, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tingström, PiaBergdahl, Björn
By organisation
CardiologyInternal MedicineFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 115 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf