liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Driving under the influence of drugs in Sweden with zero concentration limits in blood for controlled substances
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Division of clinical chemistry.
2005 (English)In: Traffic Injury Prevention, ISSN 1538-9588, Vol. 6, no 4, 317-322 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective. This article describes the background and implementation in Sweden of zero-concentration limits for controlled drugs in the blood of drivers. Eliminating the need to prove that a person's ability to drive safely was impaired by drugs has greatly simplified the prosecution case, which now rests primarily on the forensic toxicology report. Driving under the influence of a prescription drug listed as a controlled substance is exempt from the zero-limit law provided the medication was being used in accordance with a physician's direction and the person was not considered unfit to drive. Methods. The prevalence of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) in Sweden was evaluated from police reports with the main focus on the toxicological findings. A large case series of DUID suspects was compared before and after introducing zero concentration limits in blood for controlled substances on July 1, 1999. The spectrum of drugs used by typical offenders and the concentrations of various licit and illicit substances in blood were evaluated and compared. Results. Immediately after the zero-limit law came into force, the number of cases of DUID submitted by the police for toxicological analysis increased sharply and is currently ten-fold higher than before the new legislation. Statistics show that about 85% of all blood samples sent for toxicological analysis have one or more banned substances present. Amphetamine is by far the leading drug of abuse in Sweden and was identified in about 50-60% of all DUID suspects either alone or together with other controlled substances. The next most frequently encountered illicit drug was tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), with positive findings in about 20-25% of cases. Various prescription drugs, mainly sedative-hypnotics like diazepam and flunitrazepam, were also highly prevalent and these occurred mostly together with illicit substances. Opiates, such as 6-acetyl morphine and morphine, the metabolites of heroin, were high on the list of substances identified. Most DUID suspects in Sweden were men (85%) who were poly-drug users combining illicit substances, like amphetamine and/or cannabis, with a prescription medication such as various benzodiazepines. Conclusions. Sweden's zero-concentration limit has done nothing to reduce DUID or deter the typical offender because recidivism is high in this population of individuals (40-50%). Indeed, many traffic delinquents in Sweden are criminal elements in society with previous convictions for drunk and/or drugged driving as well as other offenses. The spectrum of drugs identified in blood samples from DUID suspects has not changed much since the zero-limit law was introduced. Copyright © 2005 Taylor & Francis Inc.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 6, no 4, 317-322 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-31180DOI: 10.1080/15389580500253760Local ID: 16920OAI: diva2:252003
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2012-03-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jones, A Wayne
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesDivision of clinical chemistry
In the same journal
Traffic Injury Prevention
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 15 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link