liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Storytelling as collaborative reasoning. Co-narratives in incest case accounts.
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Child Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
1992 (English)In: Explaining one's self to others. Reason-giving in a social context / [ed] Margaret L. McLaughlin, Michael J. Cody, Stephen J. Read, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates , 1992, 245-260 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Researchers in that aspect of social psychology [studying communicated explanations], ordinarily referred to as attribution theory, have, historically, studied the process of explanation strictly as an intrapsychic phenomenon. . . . Similarly, researchers who have devoted themselves to the study of "accounts," a tradition found largely within the confines of sociology, organizational behavior, and communication studies, have, for the most part, examined only the discourse manifestations of explanation, without a concomitant interest in the fundamental processes of event comprehension. This volume is devoted to bridging the gap between the two traditions. The chapters in the first section, "The Nature of Social Explanation," examine general issues of social explanation, in particular, the cognitive processes and knowledge involved in the construction of accounts. In fact, several of the chapters present general models of the cognitive processes underlying account-giving. Many of these chapters also deal with general aspects of the social context that affect the kind of explanation people offer. However, they do not focus on the impact of concrete social contexts or on specific kinds of accounts (despite the use of concrete examples to illustrate their general concerns). In contrast, chapters in the second section of the book deal more concretely with accounts. They examine the role of accounts in specific kinds of settings, such as organizations, or the courts; or they deal with specific kinds of accounts, such as accounts of racism or accounts of relationship breakdowns.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates , 1992. 245-260 p.
Keyword [en]
Attribution, Interpersonal Communication, Cognitive Processes
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-32030Local ID: 17884ISBN: 0-8058-0799-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-32030DiVA: diva2:252852
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2014-03-20

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Aronsson, KarinNilholm, Claes

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Aronsson, KarinNilholm, Claes
By organisation
Department of Child StudiesFaculty of Arts and SciencesDepartment of Communications Studies
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 131 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf