liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tilltro och misstanke: Genteknik och fosterdiagnostik i det offentliga samtalet
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Communications Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2000 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of the thesis is to study how gene technology appears as a topic in certain arenas of the public discourse. What are the premises, visions and ideas that are continuously formulated and circulated in the public discourse, and through what communicative practices are they formulated? In order to limit the vast research field, this study focuses on gene technology in relation to pre-natal diagnostics.

The empirical material is derived from five different groups of publications, namely; daily newspapers (Dagens Nyheter and Svenska Dagbladet), popular science magazines (Forskning & Framsteg and Illustrerad Vetenskap), a journal for professionals, i.e. physicians (Läkartidningen), a journal for members in a nationwide organizationfor the visually impaired (SFR-perspektiv), and parliamentary motions. The empirical material consists of texts published between 1989 and 1994.

The analyses have focused on themes, genre, actorship and narratives appearing in the empirical material. Conclusions reached by the study are that the themes occupy different positions in genres. In the debating genres, the dominant themes are ethics and regulation, and gene technology is defined as a problem that concerns the whole of society. In the news article genre, the dominant themes are scientific discoveries andtechnology and practices in use in scientific and clinical work. Two major perspectives, or narratives, could be discerned in the material, characterized by optimism and trust, and by pessimism and suspicion. Furhermore, the analysis has shown that gene technology clearly appears as a moral discourse. Several domains of expertise and power are drawn into discourse to legitimate or to reject claims of truth and value, concerning both basic human values and the presumed consequences of gene technology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet , 2000. , 285 p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 207
Keyword [en]
Gene technology, pre-natal diagnostics, discourse, public discourse, dialogue, narrative, ideology, genre, recontextualization, metaphor
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-35041Local ID: 24716ISBN: 91-7219-683-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-35041DiVA: diva2:255889
Public defence
2000-03-31, Sal Elysion, Hus-T, Universitetsområdet Valla, Linköping, 13:15 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2014-09-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Communications StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 756 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf