Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation - Development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire
2006 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, Vol. 20, no 2, 135-142 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
The aim was to develop and test a questionnaire for use in telephone interviews concerning patient evaluation of geriatric care and rehabilitation. Instrument development was performed comprising qualitative interviews, construction of items, content validation, pilot study and data collection for evaluation of care and rehabilitation, clinical utility, reliability and construct validity. Qualitative interviews were performed with 12 elderly participants. The qualitative interviews formed the basis for the construction of 45 items. An expert panel performed a content validation of the questionnaire resulting in a revised version. A pilot study comprised 29 participants recently discharged from geriatric wards and the main data collection comprised 221 participants. Inclusion criteria were being able to perform a telephone interview and willingness to participate. Clinical utility was examined through questions to the interviewers, answered in writing. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79. According to a factor analysis and the evaluation of clinical utility, the underlying dimensions of the final revised questionnaire concern 'Respect and safety', 'Information and participation' and 'Rehabilitation interventions', scored in 18 items. In addition, one global item concerns satisfaction with care, resulting in 19 items in total. The revised questionnaire was named PaPeR, Patient Perspective on care and Rehabilitation. The questionnaire is considered valid, reliable and judged to have good clinical utility. The time consumption for the telephone interview is about 10-20 minutes. The questionnaire is useful in defining areas for potential quality improvement in geriatric wards. © 2006 Nordic College of Caring Science.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 20, no 2, 135-142 p.
Patient perspective, client centred, quality of care, geriatric, questionnaire, telephone interview, reliability, validity
Medical and Health Sciences
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-36049DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.xLocal ID: 29570OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-36049DiVA: diva2:256897