liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality of care from the patient's perspective in pediatric diabetes care
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Pediatrics. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre of Paediatrics and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Paediatrics in Linköping.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Pediatrics. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre of Paediatrics and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Paediatrics in Linköping.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Center for Medical Technology Assessment. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
2006 (English)In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, ISSN 0168-8227, E-ISSN 1872-8227, Vol. 72, no 2, 197-205 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study aimed to investigate perceived quality of diabetes care. A geographic population of 400 type 1 diabetes patients <20 years received the validated questionnaire quality of care from the patient's perspective (QPP) including additional context-specific items. Primary endpoints were perceived reality of care by specific items and factors and their subjective importance, respectively. Relations to severe hypoglycemia, HbA1c, insulin dose, BMI, age, duration and sociodemographic factors were also studied. On average, a high perceived quality of care was reported from both parents and adolescents (response rate 285/400 (71%) and 155/237 (65%), respectively), highest regarding possibility to talk to nurse/doctor in privacy, respect, general atmosphere, continuity in patient-physician relationship and patient participation. Lower perceived reality with higher subjective importance was seen for information about results from medical examinations and treatments and information about self-care, access to care and waiting time. While parents' and their adolescents' mean ratings correlated well for reality r = 0.95 (p < 0.001) and importance r = 0.53 (p = 0.023), parents rated reality level higher (p = 0.012) and importance even higher (p < 0.001). The QPP instrument used with additional context-specific items can provide specific information to be used in quality of care development. In our setting, improvements are needed regarding patient information, access to care and waiting time. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 72, no 2, 197-205 p.
Keyword [en]
type 1 diabetes, children and adolescents, quality of care, patient satisfaction
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-36120DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.10.009Local ID: 29997OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-36120DiVA: diva2:256968
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2017-12-13
In thesis
1. Quality of Care in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Quality of Care in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: Type 1 diabetes is a chronic disease for which there is currently no cure, and high quality care is essential if acute and long-term complications are to be avoided. Many children and adolescents have inadequate metabolic control with increased risk for complications later in life, and adolescent girls have reported low quality of life. Differences in metabolic control between treatment centres have been found but the reasons for this are unclear. Diabetes is a largely self-managed disease. Patient education is central to successful self-management but little is known about how to make best use of diabetes communities on the Internet and integrate them into a practitioner-driven service.

Aim: The main objective of this thesis was to gain better understanding of how to improve the quality of diabetes care for children and adolescents, aiming to have near-normal blood glucose, to prevent both acute and late complications and to have good quality of life.

Methods: The geographic populations of two paediatric centres (n=400) received validated questionnaires on perceived quality of care and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). An intervention with a web portal containing diabetes-related information and social networking functions was carried out within the same population. Clinical variables from 18 651 outpatient visits registered in the Swedish paediatric diabetes quality registry, SWEDIABKIDS were analysed. Using data from SWEDIABKIDS, five centres with the lowest mean HbA1c, five with the highest, and five with the largest decrease in centre mean HbA1c between 2003 and 2007 were identified. Team members (n=128) were asked about structure, process, policy, and the messages given to patients about important diabetes issues.

Results: Specific areas that were identified as needing improvement included information about self-care, waiting time at outpatient clinics and for treatment, and access to care. Diabetes seemed to reduce HRQOL. Subjects with better metabolic control and with higher frequency of injections reported slightly higher HRQOL, as did those living with both parents compared to those with separated parents. Only 35% of children and adolescents with diabetes in Sweden had an HbA1c level below the treatment target value. Mean HbA1c showed a correlation with mean insulin dose, diabetes duration, and age. A difference between centres was found, but this could not be explained by differences in insulin dose, diabetes duration, or age. Adolescent girls reported lower HRQOL, as did parents of girls aged < 8 years. Girls also had poorer metabolic control, especially during adolescence.

In teams with the lowest and the most decreased mean HbA1c, members gave a clear message to patients and parents and had a lower HbA1c target value. Members of these teams appeared more engaged, with a more positive attitude and a greater sense of working as a team. Members of teams with the highest mean HbA1c gave a vaguer message, felt they needed clearer guidelines, and had a perception of poor collaboration within the team. High insulin dose, large centre population, and larger teams also seemed to characterize diabetes centres with low mean HbA1c. The most frequently visited pages on the web portal were the social networking pages, such as blogs, stories and discussions, followed by the diabetes team pages. Those who used the portal most actively were younger, had shorter diabetes duration, and lower HbA1c, and were more often girls. The web portal was not found to have any significant beneficial or adverse effects on HRQOL, empowerment or metabolic control.

Conclusions: The quality of diabetes care for children and adolescents in Sweden is not sufficiently good and needs to improve further if complications in later life are to be avoided. Psychosocial support for children and adolescents with diabetes should be appropriate for age and gender. The attitudes of the members in the diabetes care team and the message they give to patients and their parents seem to influence metabolic control in children and adolescents. A clear and consistent message from a unified team appears to have beneficial effects on metabolic control. A web portal that includes comprehensive information about diabetes, and the opportunity to communicate with other people with diabetes and with healthcare professionals may be a useful complement to traditional patient education tools. Members of the diabetes team should encourage its use.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2010. 74 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1208
Keyword
type 1 diabetes, pediatric, quality of care, HbA1c, quality of life, patient education, e-health
National Category
Pediatrics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-59336 (URN)978-91-7393-311-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-10-08, Berzeliussalen, Hälsouniversitetet, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-09-17 Created: 2010-09-13 Last updated: 2010-09-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Hanberger, LenaLudvigsson, JohnnyNordfeldt, Sam

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanberger, LenaLudvigsson, JohnnyNordfeldt, Sam
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesPediatricsDepartment of Paediatrics in LinköpingCenter for Medical Technology AssessmentDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
In the same journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 335 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf