liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison of different input devices for a 3D environment
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Visual Information Technology and Applications (VITA). Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology, Visual Information Technology and Applications (VITA). Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2007 (English)In: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2007,2007, London: ACM Press , 2007, 153- p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Motivation - To identify a suitable interaction modality -among the ones currently implemented in a three-dimensional (3D) environment for Air Traffic Control- for allowing interactive exploration of and gathering information about 3D weather structures. Research approach - A usability study entailing four interaction modalities (also called -interaction interfaces-): voice, wand, pen and sketch interfaces, across a task requiring 3D surface exploration, information gathering and recall of information. Quantitative data (time, errors and a composite performance index) as well as qualitative data were collected. Findings/Design - Overall, the results indicate that the wand supported a better performance when compared to the other interaction interfaces. Among the four interaction interfaces, the voice interface seems to present additional limitations, mostly related to time lag in the voice recognition, that were judged as a source of frustration. Originality/Value - The present work provides empirical results deriving from a comparative usability study of four interaction interfaces; it contributes to the study of interaction in 3D environments with new empirical data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: ACM Press , 2007. 153- p.
Keyword [en]
interaction, 3D environments, evaluation
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-38457Local ID: 44445OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-38457DiVA: diva2:259306
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2010-12-06

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Dang, Nguyen ThongTavanti, MonicaRankin, IvanCooper, Matthew

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dang, Nguyen ThongTavanti, MonicaRankin, IvanCooper, Matthew
By organisation
The Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Science and TechnologyVisual Information Technology and Applications (VITA)
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 213 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf